How we scoreBlogAdvertise
android.gsdevices · specs · comparisons
  1. android.gs
  2. Compare
  3. GT 50 Pro vs Aquos R11

Infinix GT 50 Pro vs Sharp Aquos R11

What GT 50 Pro does better (11) and where Aquos R11 wins (10) — every spec side by side.

Infinix GT 50 Pro
Infinix · 2026GT 50 Pro
9.2Score
11 advantages≈ $360
Higher score
vs
Sharp Aquos R11
Sharp · 2026Aquos R11
9.0Score
10 advantages
9.6Display8.6
8.5Camera9.2
8.6Battery7.4
6.9Features9.0
Dimensions

Size comparison

GT 50 ProAquos R11
77.2 × 162.48.274 × 1568.9
GT 50 ProAquos R11Difference
Height162.4 mm156 mm+6.4 mm
Width77.2 mm74 mm+3.2 mm
Thickness8.2 mm8.9 mm−0.7 mm
Weight198 g195 g+3 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is GT 50 Pro better than Aquos R11?

  1. Battery capacity6,150 mAh vs 5,100 mAh+21%
  2. Wireless chargingYes · Aquos R11: No
  3. Wired charging45 W vs 36 W+25%
  4. Peak brightness4,500 nits vs 3,600 nits+25%
  5. 4K video frame rate60 fps vs 30 fps2×
  6. 4K selfie videoYes · Aquos R11: No
  7. Pixel density440 ppi vs 396 ppi+11%
  8. Screen size6.8″ vs 6.5″+4%
  9. Resolution (width)1,208 px vs 1,080 px+12%
  10. Thickness8.2 mm vs 8.9 mm+9%
  11. Main camera aperturef/1.8 vs f/1.9+6%

Why is Aquos R11 better than GT 50 Pro?

  1. Refresh rate144 Hz vs 240 Hz+67%
  2. Water resistance (IPx)IPx4 vs IPx82×
  3. Telephoto cameraNo · GT 50 Pro: Yes
  4. Selfie camera13 MP vs 50 MP3.9×
  5. eSIMNo · GT 50 Pro: Yes
  6. USB version2 vs 3.2+60%
  7. Rear cameras2 vs 3+50%
  8. Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6 vs Wi-Fi 7+17%
  9. Bluetooth5.4 vs 6+11%
  10. Screen-to-body ratio85% vs 89.8%+6%
Specifications

Side by side

Design
Weight198 g195 g
Thickness8.2 mm8.9 mm
Height162.4 mm156 mm
Width77.2 mm74 mm
FramePlasticAluminium
BackPlasticGlass
Ingress protectionIP64IP68
Water resistance (IPx)IPx4IPx8
Glass protectionCorning Gorilla Glass 7iCorning Gorilla Glass Victus 2
ColoursBlack Abyss, Red Blaze, Silver GlacierNavy, Ivory, Terracotta
Display
Screen size6.8″6.5″
PanelAMOLEDPRO IGZO LTPO OLED
OLED panelYesYes
LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz)—Yes
Resolution (width)1,208 px1,080 px
Resolution (height)2,644 px2,340 px
Pixel density440 ppi396 ppi
Refresh rate144 Hz240 Hz
Peak brightness4,500 nits3,600 nits
Measured brightness1,694 nits—
Screen-to-body ratio85%89.8%
HDRYesYes
Performance
ChipsetMediatek Dimensity 8400 UltimateQualcomm SM8735 Snapdragon 8s Gen 4
Chip makerMediaTekQualcomm
Process4 nm4 nm
CPU cores88
CPU frequency3.25 GHz3.21 GHz
GPUMali-G720 MC7Adreno 825
AnTuTu score1,755,589—
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)6,806—
3DMark Wild Life Extreme4,132—
Memory
RAM12 GB12 GB
Storage (max)512 GB512 GB
Storage (base)256 GB256 GB
Storage typeUFS 4.1UFS 4.1
Memory card slotNoNo
Camera
Main camera50 MP50 MP
Main camera aperturef/1.8f/1.9
Main sensor size1/1.95"1/1.55"
Rear cameras23
Optical stabilisationYesYes
Ultra-wide cameraYesYes
Telephoto cameraNoYes
Optical zoom—3×
Max video4K4K
4K video frame rate60 fps30 fps
Selfie camera13 MP50 MP
4K selfie videoYesNo
Battery
Battery capacity6,150 mAh5,100 mAh
Battery typeSi/C—
Active use (test)15.5 h—
Wired charging45 W36 W
Wireless chargingYesNo
Wireless charging power30 W—
Reverse wireless chargingYes—
Connectivity
5GYesYes
eSIMNoYes
Dual SIMYesYes
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth5.46
NFCYesYes
USBUSB Type-C 2.0USB Type-C 3.2
USB version23.2
Infrared portYes—
Dual-band GPS—Yes
Satellite navigationGLONASS, GALILEOGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS
Features
Stereo speakersYesYes
3.5 mm headphone jackNoNo
Loudspeaker loudness-24.7 LUFS—
Fingerprint sensorUnder displaySide
SensorsFingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, compass, gyroFingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
Software
OS at launchAndroid 16Android 16
PlatformAndroidAndroid
InterfaceXOS 16—
Major OS updates promised33
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare