How we scoreBlogAdvertise
android.gsdevices · specs · comparisons
  1. android.gs
  2. Compare
  3. GT 50 Pro vs Xever 8

Infinix GT 50 Pro vs RugOne Xever 8

What GT 50 Pro does better (23) and where Xever 8 wins (6) — every spec side by side.

Infinix GT 50 Pro
Infinix · 2026GT 50 Pro
9.2Score
23 advantages≈ $360
Higher score
vs
RugOne Xever 8
RugOne · 2026Xever 8
6.8Score
6 advantages≈ $370
9.6Display6.0
8.5Camera6.4
8.6Battery3.2
6.9Features8.3
Dimensions

Size comparison

GT 50 ProXever 8
77.2 × 162.48.280 × 16814
GT 50 ProXever 8Difference
Height162.4 mm168 mm−5.6 mm
Width77.2 mm80 mm−2.8 mm
Thickness8.2 mm14 mm−5.8 mm
Weight198 g320 g−122 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is GT 50 Pro better than Xever 8?

  1. Wired charging45 W vs 18 W2.5×
  2. Peak brightness4,500 nits vs 680 nits6.6×
  3. Battery capacity6,150 mAh vs 4,800 mAh+28%
  4. RAM12 GB vs 8 GB+50%
  5. OLED panelYes · Xever 8: No
  6. Storage (max)512 GB vs 256 GB2×
  7. Optical stabilisationYes · Xever 8: No
  8. Wireless chargingYes · Xever 8: No
  9. Weight198 g vs 320 g+62%
  10. Refresh rate144 Hz vs 120 Hz+20%
  11. CPU frequency3.25 GHz vs 2.2 GHz+48%
  12. Storage (base)256 GB vs 128 GB2×

Why is Xever 8 better than GT 50 Pro?

  1. Water resistance (IPx)IPx4 vs IPx82×
  2. Main camera50 MP vs 64 MP+28%
  3. Selfie camera13 MP vs 32 MP2.5×
  4. Memory card slotNo · GT 50 Pro: Yes
  5. eSIMNo · GT 50 Pro: Yes
  6. 3.5 mm headphone jackNo · GT 50 Pro: Yes
Specifications

Side by side

RugOne Xever 8RugOne Xever 8≈ $3706.8
Design
Weight198 g320 g
Thickness8.2 mm14 mm
Height162.4 mm168 mm
Width77.2 mm80 mm
FramePlastic—
BackPlastic—
Ingress protectionIP64IP68
Water resistance (IPx)IPx4IPx8
Glass protectionCorning Gorilla Glass 7iCorning Gorilla Glass 3
ColoursBlack Abyss, Red Blaze, Silver GlacierBlack, Sand Dune
Display
Screen size6.8″6.5″
PanelAMOLEDIPS LCD
OLED panelYesNo
Resolution (width)1,208 px1,080 px
Resolution (height)2,644 px2,400 px
Pixel density440 ppi405 ppi
Refresh rate144 Hz120 Hz
Peak brightness4,500 nits680 nits
Measured brightness1,694 nits—
Screen-to-body ratio85%75.9%
HDRYes—
Performance
ChipsetMediatek Dimensity 8400 UltimateMediaTek Helio G200
Chip makerMediaTekMediaTek
Process4 nm—
CPU cores88
CPU frequency3.25 GHz2.2 GHz
GPUMali-G720 MC7Mali-G57 MC2
AnTuTu score1,755,589—
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)6,806—
3DMark Wild Life Extreme4,132—
Memory
RAM12 GB8 GB
Storage (max)512 GB256 GB
Storage (base)256 GB128 GB
Storage typeUFS 4.1UFS 2.2
Memory card slotNoYes
Camera
Main camera50 MP64 MP
Main camera aperturef/1.8f/1.9
Main sensor size1/1.95"1/1.7"
Rear cameras22
Optical stabilisationYesNo
Ultra-wide cameraYesNo
Telephoto cameraNoNo
Max video4K1080p
4K video frame rate60 fps—
Selfie camera13 MP32 MP
4K selfie videoYesNo
Battery
Battery capacity6,150 mAh4,800 mAh
Battery typeSi/CLi-Po
Active use (test)15.5 h—
Wired charging45 W18 W
Wireless chargingYesNo
Wireless charging power30 W—
Reverse wireless chargingYes—
Connectivity
5GYes—
eSIMNoYes
Dual SIMYesYes
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6Wi-Fi 5
Bluetooth5.45.2
NFCYesYes
USBUSB Type-C 2.0USB Type-C 2.0
USB version22
Infrared portYes—
Satellite navigationGLONASS, GALILEOGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS
Features
Stereo speakersYesYes
3.5 mm headphone jackNoYes
Loudspeaker loudness-24.7 LUFS—
Fingerprint sensorUnder displaySide
Barometer—Yes
SensorsFingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, compass, gyroFingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer
Software
OS at launchAndroid 16Android 16
PlatformAndroidAndroid
InterfaceXOS 16—
Major OS updates promised33
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare