android.gs
Compare
GT 50 Pro vs Reno15 F

Infinix GT 50 Pro vs OPPO Reno15 F

What GT 50 Pro does better (12) and where Reno15 F wins (6) — every spec side by side.

Infinix · 2026GT 50 Pro

9.2Score

12 advantages≈ $360

Higher score

OPPO · 2026Reno15 F

9.0Score

6 advantages≈ $350

9.6Display8.2

8.4Performance6.2

8.5Camera9.1

8.6Battery9.2

6.9Features8.4

Dimensions

Size comparison

GT 50 ProReno15 F

	GT 50 Pro	Reno15 F	Difference
Height	162.4 mm	158.2 mm	+4.2 mm
Width	77.2 mm	74.9 mm	+2.3 mm
Thickness	8.2 mm	8.1 mm	+0.1 mm
Weight	198 g	195 g	+3 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is GT 50 Pro better than Reno15 F?

AnTuTu score1,755,589 vs 865,3342×
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)6,806 vs 2,5792.6×
Peak brightness4,500 nits vs 1,400 nits3.2×
Wireless chargingYes · Reno15 F: No
Refresh rate144 Hz vs 120 Hz+20%
CPU frequency3.25 GHz vs 2.2 GHz+48%
Storage (base)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
Pixel density440 ppi vs 397 ppi+11%
Screen size6.8″ vs 6.6″+3%
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6 vs Wi-Fi 5+20%
Resolution (width)1,208 px vs 1,080 px+12%
Bluetooth5.4 vs 5.1+6%

Why is Reno15 F better than GT 50 Pro?

Wired charging45 W vs 80 W+78%
Water resistance (IPx)IPx4 vs IPx82×
Battery capacity6,150 mAh vs 7,000 mAh+14%
Selfie camera13 MP vs 50 MP3.8×
Memory card slotNo · GT 50 Pro: Yes
Screen-to-body ratio85% vs 88.6%+4%

Specifications

Side by side

Only differences	Infinix GT 50 Pro≈ $3609.2	OPPO Reno15 F≈ $3509.0
Design
Weight	198 g	195 g
Thickness	8.2 mm	8.1 mm
Height	162.4 mm	158.2 mm
Width	77.2 mm	74.9 mm
Frame	Plastic	—
Back	Plastic	Glass
Ingress protection	IP64	IP68
Water resistance (IPx)	IPx4	IPx8
Glass protection	Corning Gorilla Glass 7i	Corning Gorilla Glass+
Colours	Black Abyss, Red Blaze, Silver Glacier	Afterglow Pink, Twilight Blue, Aurora Blue
Display
Screen size	6.8″	6.6″
Panel	AMOLED	AMOLED
OLED panel	Yes	Yes
Resolution (width)	1,208 px	1,080 px
Resolution (height)	2,644 px	2,372 px
Pixel density	440 ppi	397 ppi
Refresh rate	144 Hz	120 Hz
Peak brightness	4,500 nits	1,400 nits
Measured brightness	1,694 nits	—
Screen-to-body ratio	85%	88.6%
HDR	Yes	—
Performance
Chipset	Mediatek Dimensity 8400 Ultimate	Qualcomm SM6450 Snapdragon 6 Gen 1
Chip maker	MediaTek	Qualcomm
Process	4 nm	4 nm
CPU cores	8	8
CPU frequency	3.25 GHz	2.2 GHz
GPU	Mali-G720 MC7	Adreno 710
AnTuTu score	1,755,589	865,334
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)	6,806	2,579
3DMark Wild Life Extreme	4,132	—
Memory
RAM	12 GB	12 GB
Storage (max)	512 GB	512 GB
Storage (base)	256 GB	128 GB
Storage type	UFS 4.1	UFS 3.1
Memory card slot	No	Yes
Camera
Main camera	50 MP	50 MP
Main camera aperture	f/1.8	f/1.8
Main sensor size	1/1.95"	1/1.95"
Rear cameras	2	2
Optical stabilisation	Yes	Yes
Ultra-wide camera	Yes	Yes
Telephoto camera	No	No
Max video	4K	4K
4K video frame rate	60 fps	60 fps
Selfie camera	13 MP	50 MP
4K selfie video	Yes	Yes
Battery
Battery capacity	6,150 mAh	7,000 mAh
Battery type	Si/C	Si/C
Active use (test)	15.5 h	—
Wired charging	45 W	80 W
Charged in 30 min	—	50%
Wireless charging	Yes	No
Wireless charging power	30 W	—
Reverse wireless charging	Yes	—
Connectivity
5G	Yes	Yes
eSIM	No	No
Dual SIM	Yes	Yes
Wi-Fi standard	Wi-Fi 6	Wi-Fi 5
Bluetooth	5.4	5.1
NFC	Yes	Yes
USB	USB Type-C 2.0	USB Type-C 2.0
USB version	2	2
Infrared port	Yes	—
Satellite navigation	GLONASS, GALILEO	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS
Features
Stereo speakers	Yes	Yes
3.5 mm headphone jack	No	No
Loudspeaker loudness	-24.7 LUFS	—
Fingerprint sensor	Under display	Under display
Sensors	Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, compass, gyro	Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
Software
OS at launch	Android 16	Android 16
Platform	Android	Android
Interface	XOS 16	ColorOS 16
Major OS updates promised	3	—
EU label
Energy class	—	A
Battery charge cycles	—	1,600
Endurance per cycle	—	68 h
Repairability class	—	B
Drop resistance class	—	C