- android.gs
- Compare
- GT 30 vs Poco C85 4G
Infinix GT 30 vs Xiaomi Poco C85 4G
What GT 30 does better (18) and where Poco C85 4G wins (3) — every spec side by side.
vs
9.6Display6.4
7.0Camera4.6
8.0Battery7.8
6.3Features5.4
Dimensions
Size comparison
GT 30Poco C85 4G
| GT 30 | Poco C85 4G | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 163.7 mm | 171.6 mm | −7.9 mm |
| Width | 75.8 mm | 79.5 mm | −3.7 mm |
| Thickness | 8 mm | 8 mm | = |
| Weight | 187 g | 205 g | −18 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is GT 30 better than Poco C85 4G?
- Peak brightness4,500 nits vs 810 nits5.6×
- OLED panelYes · Poco C85 4G: No
- Stereo speakersYes · Poco C85 4G: No
- Wired charging45 W vs 33 W+36%
- Pixel density440 ppi vs 254 ppi+73%
- Main camera64 MP vs 50 MP+28%
- Refresh rate144 Hz vs 120 Hz+20%
- Process4 nm vs 12 nm3×
- CPU frequency2.6 GHz vs 2 GHz+30%
- Rear cameras2 vs 12×
- Ultra-wide cameraYes · Poco C85 4G: No
- Max video4K vs 1080p
Why is Poco C85 4G better than GT 30?
- Battery capacity5,500 mAh vs 6,000 mAh+9%
- Memory card slotNo · GT 30: Yes
- 3.5 mm headphone jackNo · GT 30: Yes
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 187 g | 205 g |
| Thickness | 8 mm | 8 mm |
| Height | 163.7 mm | 171.6 mm |
| Width | 75.8 mm | 79.5 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Plastic | — |
| Ingress protection | IP64 | IP64 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | IPx4 |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 7i | — |
| Colours | Pulse Green, Cyber Blue, Blade White | Purple, Black, Green |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.9″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | Yes | No |
| Resolution (width) | 1,224 px | 720 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,720 px | 1,600 px |
| Pixel density | 440 ppi | 254 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 4,500 nits | 810 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 89.4% | 84.3% |
| HDR | Yes | — |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7400 | Mediatek Helio G81 Ultra |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | MediaTek |
| Process | 4 nm | 12 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.6 GHz | 2 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G615 MC2 | Mali-G52 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | 963,424 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 3,185 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Memory card slot | No | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 64 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.73" | 1/2.76" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 1080p |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | — |
| Selfie camera | 13 MP | 8 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,500 mAh | 6,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | — |
| Wired charging | 45 W | 33 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 48% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | — |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | Yes | — |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | Yes |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, compass, gyro | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 15 | Android 15 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | XOS 15 | HyperOS 2 |
| Major OS updates promised | 2 | — |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | — | A |
| Battery charge cycles | — | 1,000 |
| Endurance per cycle | — | 78 h |
| Repairability class | — | C |
| Drop resistance class | — | A |
