- android.gs
- Compare
- GT 30 vs WP200
Infinix GT 30 vs Oukitel WP200
What GT 30 does better (12) and where WP200 wins (9) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
GT 30WP200
| GT 30 | WP200 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 163.7 mm | 163.6 mm | +0.1 mm |
| Width | 75.8 mm | 77.9 mm | −2.1 mm |
| Thickness | 8 mm | 13.7 mm | −5.7 mm |
| Weight | 187 g | 311 g | −124 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is GT 30 better than WP200?
- Peak brightness4,500 nits vs 500 nits9×
- Stereo speakersYes · WP200: No
- Weight187 g vs 311 g+66%
- Refresh rate144 Hz vs 120 Hz+20%
- Rear cameras2 vs 12×
- Ultra-wide cameraYes · WP200: No
- 4K selfie videoYes · WP200: No
- Pixel density440 ppi vs 394 ppi+12%
- Thickness8 mm vs 13.7 mm+71%
- Resolution (width)1,224 px vs 1,080 px+13%
- Main camera aperturef/1.8 vs f/1.9+6%
- Screen-to-body ratio89.4% vs 84.8%+5%
Why is WP200 better than GT 30?
- Battery capacity5,500 mAh vs 8,800 mAh+60%
- Main camera64 MP vs 108 MP+69%
- RAM8 GB vs 12 GB+50%
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx4 vs IPx82×
- Storage (max)256 GB vs 512 GB2×
- Storage (base)128 GB vs 512 GB4×
- Selfie camera13 MP vs 32 MP2.5×
- Memory card slotNo · GT 30: Yes
- CPU frequency2.6 GHz vs 3.1 GHz+19%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 187 g | 311 g |
| Thickness | 8 mm | 13.7 mm |
| Height | 163.7 mm | 163.6 mm |
| Width | 75.8 mm | 77.9 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | — |
| Back | Plastic | — |
| Ingress protection | IP64 | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 7i | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Colours | Pulse Green, Cyber Blue, Blade White | Blue, Green, Gray |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,224 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,720 px | 2,412 px |
| Pixel density | 440 ppi | 394 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 4,500 nits | 500 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 89.4% | 84.8% |
| HDR | Yes | — |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7400 | Mediatek Dimensity 8200 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | MediaTek |
| Process | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.6 GHz | 3.1 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G615 MC2 | Mali-G610 MC6 |
| AnTuTu score | 963,424 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 3,185 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 512 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 512 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | — |
| Memory card slot | No | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 64 MP | 108 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.9 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.73" | 1/1.8" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 13 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,500 mAh | 8,800 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 45 W | 45 W |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.3 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | Yes | — |
| Dual-band GPS | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, compass, gyro | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, compass, gyro |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 15 | Android 15 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | XOS 15 | — |
| Major OS updates promised | 2 | — |
