- android.gs
- Compare
- GT 20 Pro vs Zero 40 4G
Infinix GT 20 Pro vs Infinix Zero 40 4G
What GT 20 Pro does better (12) and where Zero 40 4G wins (6) — every spec side by side.
vs
9.1Display8.4
7.8Performance4.0
8.7Camera8.8
6.8Battery6.8
7.5Features4.1
Dimensions
Size comparison
GT 20 ProZero 40 4G
| GT 20 Pro | Zero 40 4G | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 164.3 mm | 164.3 mm | = |
| Width | 75.4 mm | 74.6 mm | +0.8 mm |
| Thickness | 8.2 mm | 7.7 mm | +0.5 mm |
| Weight | 194 g | 180 g | +14 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is GT 20 Pro better than Zero 40 4G?
- AnTuTu score1,306,340 vs 504,5552.6×
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)3,759 vs 1,951+93%
- RAM12 GB vs 8 GB+50%
- 5GYes · Zero 40 4G: No
- Stereo speakersYes · Zero 40 4G: No
- Refresh rate144 Hz vs 120 Hz+20%
- CPU frequency3.1 GHz vs 2.2 GHz+41%
- Memory card slotYes · Zero 40 4G: No
- Max video4K vs 1080p
- Process4 nm vs 6 nm+50%
- Charged in 30 min73% vs 60%+22%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6 vs Wi-Fi 5+20%
Why is Zero 40 4G better than GT 20 Pro?
- Storage (max)256 GB vs 512 GB2×
- Rear cameras1 vs 22×
- Ultra-wide cameraNo · GT 20 Pro: Yes
- Weight194 g vs 180 g+8%
- Selfie camera32 MP vs 50 MP+56%
- Thickness8.2 mm vs 7.7 mm+6%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 194 g | 180 g |
| Thickness | 8.2 mm | 7.7 mm |
| Height | 164.3 mm | 164.3 mm |
| Width | 75.4 mm | 74.6 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Plastic | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP54 | IP54 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | IPx4 |
| Glass protection | — | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Colours | Mecha Blue, Mecha Orange, Mecha Silver | Misty Aqua, Rock Black, Blossom Glow |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,436 px | 2,436 px |
| Pixel density | 388 ppi | 393 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,300 nits | 1,300 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 91% | 89.7% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 8200 Ultimate | Mediatek Helio G100 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | MediaTek |
| Process | 4 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 3.1 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G610 MC6 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | 1,306,340 | 504,555 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 3,759 | 1,951 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 512 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 108 MP | 108 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.67" | 1/1.67" |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 1080p |
| 4K video frame rate | 60 fps | — |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 50 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 45 W | 45 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 73% | 60% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.2 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, compass, gyro | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 14 | Android 14 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | XOS 14 | XOS 14.5 |
| Major OS updates promised | — | 2 |
