- android.gs
- Compare
- GT 10 Pro vs Redmi K70E
Infinix GT 10 Pro vs Xiaomi Redmi K70E
What GT 10 Pro does better (5) and where Redmi K70E wins (16) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.6Display8.6
5.7Performance8.5
7.0Camera8.4
6.8Battery8.7
5.6Features8.7
Dimensions
Size comparison
GT 10 ProRedmi K70E
| GT 10 Pro | Redmi K70E | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 162.7 mm | 160.5 mm | +2.2 mm |
| Width | 75.9 mm | 74.3 mm | +1.6 mm |
| Thickness | 8.1 mm | 8.1 mm | = |
| Weight | 187 g | 198 g | −11 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is GT 10 Pro better than Redmi K70E?
- Main camera108 MP vs 64 MP+69%
- Memory card slotYes · Redmi K70E: No
- Selfie camera32 MP vs 16 MP2×
- 3.5 mm headphone jackYes · Redmi K70E: No
- Weight187 g vs 198 g+6%
Why is Redmi K70E better than GT 10 Pro?
- AnTuTu score666,948 vs 1,886,4292.8×
- RAM8 GB vs 16 GB2×
- Wired charging45 W vs 90 W2×
- Storage (max)256 GB vs 1,024 GB4×
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)3,080 vs 4,708+53%
- Peak brightness900 nits vs 1,800 nits2×
- Optical stabilisationNo · GT 10 Pro: Yes
- Battery capacity5,000 mAh vs 5,500 mAh+10%
- Rear cameras1 vs 22×
- Ultra-wide cameraNo · GT 10 Pro: Yes
- Pixel density395 ppi vs 446 ppi+13%
- CPU frequency3 GHz vs 3.35 GHz+12%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 187 g | 198 g |
| Thickness | 8.1 mm | 8.1 mm |
| Height | 162.7 mm | 160.5 mm |
| Width | 75.9 mm | 74.3 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | — |
| Back | Plastic | — |
| Ingress protection | IP53 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx3 | — |
| Glass protection | — | Corning Gorilla Glass |
| Colours | Cyber Black, Mirage Silver | Black, White, Mint |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | OLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,220 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,400 px | 2,712 px |
| Pixel density | 395 ppi | 446 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 900 nits | 1,800 nits |
| Measured brightness | 701 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 87% | 90.1% |
| HDR | — | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 8050 | Mediatek Dimensity 8300 Ultra |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | MediaTek |
| Process | 6 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 3 GHz | 3.35 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 | Mali G615-MC6 |
| AnTuTu score | 666,948 | 1,886,429 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 3,080 | 4,708 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 2,768 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 16 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 1,024 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 4.0 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 108 MP | 64 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | — |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.67" | 1/2.0" |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 16 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,500 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 45 W | 90 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 73% | 88% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -25.1 LUFS | — |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, compass, gyro | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, gyro, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 13 | Android 14 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | XOS 13 | HyperOS |
| Major OS updates promised | 1 | — |
