- android.gs
- Compare
- GT 10 Pro vs Camon 20 Pro 5G
Infinix GT 10 Pro vs Tecno Camon 20 Pro 5G
What GT 10 Pro does better (6) and where Camon 20 Pro 5G wins (4) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.6Display7.5
5.7Performance6.4
7.0Camera8.1
6.8Battery6.0
5.6Features6.5
Dimensions
Size comparison
GT 10 ProCamon 20 Pro 5G
| GT 10 Pro | Camon 20 Pro 5G | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 162.7 mm | 162.7 mm | = |
| Width | 75.9 mm | 75.9 mm | = |
| Thickness | 8.1 mm | 7.8 mm | +0.3 mm |
| Weight | 187 g | 193 g | −6 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is GT 10 Pro better than Camon 20 Pro 5G?
- Main camera108 MP vs 64 MP+69%
- Wired charging45 W vs 33 W+36%
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)3,080 vs 2,905+6%
- Charged in 30 min73% vs 38%+92%
- Weight187 g vs 193 g+3%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6 vs Wi-Fi 5+20%
Why is Camon 20 Pro 5G better than GT 10 Pro?
- AnTuTu score666,948 vs 1,031,881+55%
- Optical stabilisationNo · GT 10 Pro: Yes
- Main camera aperturef/1.8 vs f/1.7+6%
- Thickness8.1 mm vs 7.8 mm+4%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 187 g | 193 g |
| Thickness | 8.1 mm | 7.8 mm |
| Height | 162.7 mm | 162.7 mm |
| Width | 75.9 mm | 75.9 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Plastic | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP53 | IP53 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx3 | IPx3 |
| Colours | Cyber Black, Mirage Silver | Dark Welkin, Serenity Blue |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,400 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 395 ppi | 395 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 900 nits | 900 nits |
| Measured brightness | 701 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 87% | 87% |
| HDR | — | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 8050 | Mediatek Dimensity 8050 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | MediaTek |
| Process | 6 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 3 GHz | 3 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 | Mali-G77 MC9 |
| AnTuTu score | 666,948 | 1,031,881 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 3,080 | 2,905 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 1,300 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 108 MP | 64 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.7 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.67" | 1/1.7" |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 45 W | 33 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 73% | 38% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.2 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO | GLONASS, GALILEO, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -25.1 LUFS | — |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, compass, gyro | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 13 | Android 13 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | XOS 13 | HIOS 14 |
| Major OS updates promised | 1 | — |
