- android.gs
- Compare
- GT 10 Pro vs Galaxy M53
Infinix GT 10 Pro vs Samsung Galaxy M53
What GT 10 Pro does better (10) and where Galaxy M53 wins (7) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.6Display6.8
5.7Performance5.4
7.0Camera7.6
6.8Battery5.3
5.6Features7.1
Dimensions
Size comparison
GT 10 ProGalaxy M53
| GT 10 Pro | Galaxy M53 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 162.7 mm | 164.7 mm | −2 mm |
| Width | 75.9 mm | 77 mm | −1.1 mm |
| Thickness | 8.1 mm | 7.4 mm | +0.7 mm |
| Weight | 187 g | 176 g | +11 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is GT 10 Pro better than Galaxy M53?
- Wired charging45 W vs 25 W+80%
- Peak brightness900 nits vs 400 nits2.2×
- Stereo speakersYes · Galaxy M53: No
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)3,080 vs 2,449+26%
- CPU frequency3 GHz vs 2.4 GHz+25%
- Storage (base)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
- 3.5 mm headphone jackYes · Galaxy M53: No
- Charged in 30 min73% vs 44%+66%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6 vs Wi-Fi 5+20%
- Loudspeaker loudness-25.1 LUFS vs -29.3 LUFS+-14%
Why is Galaxy M53 better than GT 10 Pro?
- AnTuTu score666,948 vs 680,628+2%
- Rear cameras1 vs 22×
- Ultra-wide cameraNo · GT 10 Pro: Yes
- 4K selfie videoNo · GT 10 Pro: Yes
- Measured brightness701 nits vs 802 nits+14%
- Weight187 g vs 176 g+6%
- Thickness8.1 mm vs 7.4 mm+9%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 187 g | 176 g |
| Thickness | 8.1 mm | 7.4 mm |
| Height | 162.7 mm | 164.7 mm |
| Width | 75.9 mm | 77 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Plastic | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP53 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx3 | — |
| Glass protection | — | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Colours | Cyber Black, Mirage Silver | Green, Blue, Brown |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,400 px | 2,408 px |
| Pixel density | 395 ppi | 394 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 900 nits | 400 nits |
| Measured brightness | 701 nits | 802 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 87% | 85.3% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 8050 | Mediatek Dimensity 900 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | MediaTek |
| Process | 6 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 3 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 | Mali-G68 MC4 |
| AnTuTu score | 666,948 | 680,628 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 3,080 | 2,449 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 609 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 2.1 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 108 MP | 108 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.67" | 1/1.67" |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Ion |
| Wired charging | 45 W | 25 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 73% | 44% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.2 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -25.1 LUFS | -29.3 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, compass, gyro | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| SAR (head) | — | 0.6 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 13 | Android 12 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | XOS 13 | One UI 5.1 |
| Major OS updates promised | 1 | — |
