- android.gs
- Compare
- GT 10 Pro vs Narzo 60 Pro
Infinix GT 10 Pro vs Realme Narzo 60 Pro
What GT 10 Pro does better (6) and where Narzo 60 Pro wins (6) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.6Display7.6
7.0Camera7.9
6.8Battery7.2
5.6Features8.7
Dimensions
Size comparison
GT 10 ProNarzo 60 Pro
| GT 10 Pro | Narzo 60 Pro | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 162.7 mm | 161.6 mm | +1.1 mm |
| Width | 75.9 mm | 73.9 mm | +2 mm |
| Thickness | 8.1 mm | 8.2 mm | −0.1 mm |
| Weight | 187 g | 185 g | +2 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is GT 10 Pro better than Narzo 60 Pro?
- Main camera108 MP vs 100 MP+8%
- Storage (base)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
- Memory card slotYes · Narzo 60 Pro: No
- Selfie camera32 MP vs 16 MP2×
- 3.5 mm headphone jackYes · Narzo 60 Pro: No
- CPU frequency3 GHz vs 2.6 GHz+15%
Why is Narzo 60 Pro better than GT 10 Pro?
- Storage (max)256 GB vs 1,024 GB4×
- RAM8 GB vs 12 GB+50%
- Wired charging45 W vs 67 W+49%
- Optical stabilisationNo · GT 10 Pro: Yes
- Peak brightness900 nits vs 950 nits+6%
- Screen-to-body ratio87% vs 90.5%+4%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 187 g | 185 g |
| Thickness | 8.1 mm | 8.2 mm |
| Height | 162.7 mm | 161.6 mm |
| Width | 75.9 mm | 73.9 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Plastic | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP53 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx3 | — |
| Glass protection | — | Double-reinforced glass |
| Colours | Cyber Black, Mirage Silver | Mars Orange, Cosmic Black |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,400 px | 2,412 px |
| Pixel density | 395 ppi | 394 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 900 nits | 950 nits |
| Measured brightness | 701 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 87% | 90.5% |
| HDR | — | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 8050 | Mediatek Dimensity 7050 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | MediaTek |
| Process | 6 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 3 GHz | 2.6 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 | Mali-G68 MC4 |
| AnTuTu score | 666,948 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 3,080 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 1,024 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | — |
| Memory card slot | Yes | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 108 MP | 100 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.67" | — |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 16 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | — |
| Wired charging | 45 W | 67 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 73% | — |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.2 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -25.1 LUFS | — |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, compass, gyro | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 13 | Android 13 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | XOS 13 | realme UI 4.0 |
| Major OS updates promised | 1 | — |
