- android.gs
- Compare
- GT 10 Pro vs Moto G54 5G
Infinix GT 10 Pro vs Motorola Moto G54 5G
What GT 10 Pro does better (17) and where Moto G54 5G wins (5) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.6Display5.8
5.7Performance5.4
7.0Camera8.2
6.8Battery6.0
5.6Features6.9
Dimensions
Size comparison
GT 10 ProMoto G54 5G
| GT 10 Pro | Moto G54 5G | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 162.7 mm | 161.6 mm | +1.1 mm |
| Width | 75.9 mm | 73.8 mm | +2.1 mm |
| Thickness | 8.1 mm | 8.9 mm | −0.8 mm |
| Weight | 187 g | 192 g | −5 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is GT 10 Pro better than Moto G54 5G?
- Main camera108 MP vs 50 MP2.2×
- OLED panelYes · Moto G54 5G: No
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)3,080 vs 2,248+37%
- Wired charging45 W vs 33 W+36%
- AnTuTu score666,948 vs 639,509+4%
- Peak brightness900 nits vs 560 nits+61%
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx3 vs IPx2+50%
- Measured brightness701 nits vs 469 nits+49%
- CPU frequency3 GHz vs 2.2 GHz+36%
- Storage (base)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
- Max video4K vs 1080p
- Selfie camera32 MP vs 16 MP2×
Why is Moto G54 5G better than GT 10 Pro?
- RAM8 GB vs 12 GB+50%
- Optical stabilisationNo · GT 10 Pro: Yes
- Rear cameras1 vs 22×
- eSIMNo · GT 10 Pro: Yes
- Pixel density395 ppi vs 405 ppi+3%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 187 g | 192 g |
| Thickness | 8.1 mm | 8.9 mm |
| Height | 162.7 mm | 161.6 mm |
| Width | 75.9 mm | 73.8 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Plastic | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP53 | IP52 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx3 | IPx2 |
| Colours | Cyber Black, Mirage Silver | Blue, Green |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.5″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | IPS |
| OLED panel | Yes | No |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,400 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 395 ppi | 405 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 900 nits | 560 nits |
| Measured brightness | 701 nits | 469 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 87% | 86% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 8050 | Mediatek Dimensity 7020 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Mediatek |
| Process | 6 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 3 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 | IMG BXM-8-256 |
| AnTuTu score | 666,948 | 639,509 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 3,080 | 2,248 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 108 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.67" | — |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Optical zoom | — | 8× |
| Max video | 4K | 1080p |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | — |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 16 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 45 W | 33 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 73% | 45% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | Yes |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.3 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -25.1 LUFS | — |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, compass, gyro | proximity, accelerometer, compass, fingerprint |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 13 | Android 13 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | XOS 13 | Hello UI |
| Major OS updates promised | 1 | — |
