- android.gs
- Compare
- P40 Pro vs iQOO Z1
Huawei P40 Pro vs Vivo iQOO Z1
What P40 Pro does better (17) and where iQOO Z1 wins (8) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
P40 ProiQOO Z1
| P40 Pro | iQOO Z1 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 158.2 mm | 164 mm | −5.8 mm |
| Width | 72.6 mm | 75.6 mm | −3 mm |
| Thickness | 9 mm | 8.9 mm | +0.1 mm |
| Weight | 209 g | 195 g | +14 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is P40 Pro better than iQOO Z1?
- OLED panelYes · iQOO Z1: No
- Storage (max)512 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Optical stabilisationYes · iQOO Z1: No
- Telephoto cameraYes · iQOO Z1: No
- Wireless chargingYes · iQOO Z1: No
- Main camera50 MP vs 48 MP+4%
- Memory card slotYes · iQOO Z1: No
- 4K video frame rate60 fps vs 30 fps2×
- Selfie camera32 MP vs 16 MP2×
- 4K selfie videoYes · iQOO Z1: No
- eSIMYes · iQOO Z1: No
- CPU frequency2.86 GHz vs 2.6 GHz+10%
Why is iQOO Z1 better than P40 Pro?
- Refresh rate90 Hz vs 144 Hz+60%
- RAM8 GB vs 12 GB+50%
- Battery capacity4,200 mAh vs 4,500 mAh+7%
- Wired charging40 W vs 44 W+10%
- 3.5 mm headphone jackNo · P40 Pro: Yes
- Weight209 g vs 195 g+7%
- Charged in 30 min52% vs 65%+25%
- Main camera aperturef/1.9 vs f/1.8+6%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 209 g | 195 g |
| Thickness | 9 mm | 8.9 mm |
| Height | 158.2 mm | 164 mm |
| Width | 72.6 mm | 75.6 mm |
| Frame | Aluminium | — |
| Back | Glass | — |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | — |
| Colours | Silver Frost, Blush Gold, Deep Sea Blue, Ice White, Black | Galaxy Silver, Space blue |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.6″ | 6.6″ |
| Panel | OLED | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | Yes | No |
| Resolution (width) | 1,200 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,640 px | 2,408 px |
| Pixel density | 441 ppi | 402 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 600 nits | — |
| Measured brightness | 494 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 91.6% | 83.9% |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Kirin 990 5G | Mediatek Dimensity 1000+ |
| Chip maker | Kirin | MediaTek |
| Process | 7 nm | 7 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.86 GHz | 2.6 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G76 MP16 | Mali-G77 MC9 |
| AnTuTu score | 496,356 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 12,848 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 512 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.0 | UFS 2.1 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 48 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.28" | 1/2.0" |
| Rear cameras | 3 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | Yes | No |
| Optical zoom | 5× | — |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 60 fps | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 16 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,200 mAh | 4,500 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | — |
| Wired charging | 40 W | 44 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 52% | 65% |
| Wireless charging | Yes | No |
| Wireless charging power | 27 W | — |
| Reverse wireless charging | Yes | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | Yes | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.1 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 3.1 | 2 |
| Infrared port | Yes | — |
| Dual-band GPS | Yes | — |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -27.5 LUFS | — |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Side |
| 3D face unlock | Yes | — |
| Barometer | Yes | — |
| Sensors | Infrared Face ID, fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 10 | Android 10 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | EMUI 12 | — |
