- android.gs
- Compare
- P40 Pro vs Armor 9E
Huawei P40 Pro vs UleFone Armor 9E
What P40 Pro does better (23) and where Armor 9E wins (3) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
P40 ProArmor 9E
| P40 Pro | Armor 9E | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 158.2 mm | 168.2 mm | −10 mm |
| Width | 72.6 mm | 82 mm | −9.4 mm |
| Thickness | 9 mm | 15 mm | −6 mm |
| Weight | 209 g | 324 g | −115 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is P40 Pro better than Armor 9E?
- Wired charging40 W vs 18 W2.2×
- Storage (max)512 GB vs 128 GB4×
- Refresh rate90 Hz vs 60 Hz+50%
- OLED panelYes · Armor 9E: No
- Optical stabilisationYes · Armor 9E: No
- Telephoto cameraYes · Armor 9E: No
- Wireless chargingYes · Armor 9E: No
- 5GYes · Armor 9E: No
- Weight209 g vs 324 g+55%
- Selfie camera32 MP vs 8 MP4×
- CPU frequency2.86 GHz vs 2.2 GHz+30%
- 4K video frame rate60 fps vs 30 fps2×
Why is Armor 9E better than P40 Pro?
- Battery capacity4,200 mAh vs 6,600 mAh+57%
- Main camera50 MP vs 64 MP+28%
- 3.5 mm headphone jackNo · P40 Pro: Yes
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 209 g | 324 g |
| Thickness | 9 mm | 15 mm |
| Height | 158.2 mm | 168.2 mm |
| Width | 72.6 mm | 82 mm |
| Frame | Aluminium | Aluminium |
| Back | Glass | Aluminium |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | — | Scratch-resistant glass, oleophobic coating |
| Colours | Silver Frost, Blush Gold, Deep Sea Blue, Ice White, Black | Black |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.6″ | 6.3″ |
| Panel | OLED | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | Yes | No |
| Resolution (width) | 1,200 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,640 px | 2,340 px |
| Pixel density | 441 ppi | 409 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 600 nits | — |
| Measured brightness | 494 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 91.6% | 70.6% |
| HDR | Yes | — |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Kirin 990 5G | Mediatek MT6779 Helio P90 |
| Chip maker | Kirin | MediaTek |
| Process | 7 nm | 12 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.86 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G76 MP16 | PowerVR GM9446 |
| AnTuTu score | 496,356 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 12,848 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 512 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.0 | UFS 2.1 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 64 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.9 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.28" | 1/1.72" |
| Rear cameras | 3 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | Yes | No |
| Optical zoom | 5× | — |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 60 fps | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 8 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,200 mAh | 6,600 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 40 W | 18 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 52% | — |
| Wireless charging | Yes | No |
| Wireless charging power | 27 W | — |
| Reverse wireless charging | Yes | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | No |
| eSIM | Yes | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.1 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 3.1 | 2 |
| Infrared port | Yes | — |
| Dual-band GPS | Yes | — |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -27.5 LUFS | — |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Side |
| 3D face unlock | Yes | — |
| Barometer | Yes | — |
| Sensors | Infrared Face ID, fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, coulombmeter |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 10 | Android 10 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | EMUI 12 | — |
