- android.gs
- Compare
- P40 lite 5G vs Galaxy A52
Huawei P40 lite 5G vs Samsung Galaxy A52
What P40 lite 5G does better (5) and where Galaxy A52 wins (9) — every spec side by side.
vs
4.6Display6.9
7.2Camera8.7
3.8Battery3.2
7.1Features5.9
Dimensions
Size comparison
P40 lite 5GGalaxy A52
| P40 lite 5G | Galaxy A52 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 162.3 mm | 159.9 mm | +2.4 mm |
| Width | 75 mm | 75.1 mm | −0.1 mm |
| Thickness | 8.6 mm | 8.4 mm | +0.2 mm |
| Weight | 189 g | 189 g | = |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is P40 lite 5G better than Galaxy A52?
- Wired charging40 W vs 25 W+60%
- 5GYes · Galaxy A52: No
- CPU frequency2.36 GHz vs 2.3 GHz+3%
- Charged in 30 min70% vs 50%+40%
- Process7 nm vs 8 nm+14%
Why is Galaxy A52 better than P40 lite 5G?
- Refresh rate60 Hz vs 90 Hz+50%
- OLED panelNo · P40 lite 5G: Yes
- Storage (max)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Optical stabilisationNo · P40 lite 5G: Yes
- Stereo speakersNo · P40 lite 5G: Yes
- Battery capacity4,000 mAh vs 4,500 mAh+12%
- Selfie camera16 MP vs 32 MP2×
- 4K selfie videoNo · P40 lite 5G: Yes
- Thickness8.6 mm vs 8.4 mm+2%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 189 g | 189 g |
| Thickness | 8.6 mm | 8.4 mm |
| Height | 162.3 mm | 159.9 mm |
| Width | 75 mm | 75.1 mm |
| Frame | — | Plastic |
| Back | — | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | — | IP67 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx7 |
| Glass protection | — | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Colours | Crush Green, Space Silver, Midnight Black | Awesome Black, Awesome White, Awesome Violet, Awesome Blue |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.5″ | 6.5″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| OLED panel | No | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,400 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 405 ppi | 407 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 90 Hz |
| Peak brightness | — | 800 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 794 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 83.8% | 84.1% |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Kirin 820 5G | Qualcomm SM7125 Snapdragon 720G |
| Chip maker | Kirin | Qualcomm |
| Process | 7 nm | 8 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.36 GHz | 2.3 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G57 | Adreno 618 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 261,282 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 5,865 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 313 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 2.1 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 64 MP | 64 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | — | 1/1.7" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 16 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,000 mAh | 4,500 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 40 W | 25 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 70% | 50% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Reverse wireless charging | Yes | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -27 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Under display |
| Barometer | Yes | — |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| SAR (head) | — | 0.35 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 10 | Android 11 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | EMUI 10.1 | One UI 6.1 |
