- android.gs
- Compare
- P20 Pro vs Galaxy A70
Huawei P20 Pro vs Samsung Galaxy A70
What P20 Pro does better (9) and where Galaxy A70 wins (14) — every spec side by side.
vs
5.0Display5.9
3.3Performance3.2
8.2Camera5.9
2.9Battery3.2
5.9Features5.0
Dimensions
Size comparison
P20 ProGalaxy A70
| P20 Pro | Galaxy A70 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 155 mm | 164.3 mm | −9.3 mm |
| Width | 73.9 mm | 76.7 mm | −2.8 mm |
| Thickness | 7.8 mm | 7.9 mm | −0.1 mm |
| Weight | 180 g | 183 g | −3 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is P20 Pro better than Galaxy A70?
- Optical stabilisationYes · Galaxy A70: No
- Telephoto cameraYes · Galaxy A70: No
- Stereo speakersYes · Galaxy A70: No
- Main camera40 MP vs 32 MP+25%
- CPU frequency2.4 GHz vs 2 GHz+20%
- Pixel density408 ppi vs 393 ppi+4%
- USB version3.1 vs 2+55%
- Charged in 30 min50% vs 45%+11%
- Process10 nm vs 11 nm+10%
Why is Galaxy A70 better than P20 Pro?
- Battery capacity4,000 mAh vs 4,500 mAh+12%
- AnTuTu score460,393 vs 480,034+4%
- Peak brightness400 nits vs 600 nits+50%
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)1,480 vs 1,672+13%
- Wired charging22 W vs 25 W+11%
- Memory card slotNo · P20 Pro: Yes
- 3.5 mm headphone jackNo · P20 Pro: Yes
- Screen size6.1″ vs 6.7″+10%
- Measured brightness585 nits vs 604 nits+3%
- Rear cameras2 vs 3+50%
- Selfie camera24 MP vs 32 MP+33%
- Bluetooth4.2 vs 5+19%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 180 g | 183 g |
| Thickness | 7.8 mm | 7.9 mm |
| Height | 155 mm | 164.3 mm |
| Width | 73.9 mm | 76.7 mm |
| Frame | Aluminium | Plastic |
| Back | Glass | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP67 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx7 | — |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Colours | Black, Gold, Blue, Purple | White, Black, Blue |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.1″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | OLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,240 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 408 ppi | 393 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 400 nits | 600 nits |
| Measured brightness | 585 nits | 604 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 82% | 86% |
| HDR | Yes | — |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | HiSilicon Kirin 970 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 |
| Chip maker | HiSilicon | Qualcomm |
| Process | 10 nm | 11 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.4 GHz | 2 GHz |
| GPU | Mali G72 MP12 | Adreno 612 |
| AnTuTu score | 460,393 | 480,034 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 1,480 | 1,672 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 6 GB | 6 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.1 | UFS 2.1 |
| Memory card slot | No | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 40 MP | 32 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.7 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.74" | 1/2.8" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 3 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | No |
| Telephoto camera | Yes | No |
| Optical zoom | 3× | — |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 24 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,000 mAh | 4,500 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 22 W | 25 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 50% | 45% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 4.2 | 5 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 3.1 | 2 |
| Infrared port | Yes | — |
| Satellite navigation | GPS, GLONASS, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | Yes |
| Fingerprint sensor | Yes | Under display |
| Sensors | proximity, accelerometer, gyro, light, compass, hall, color spectrum, fingerprint | fingerprint |
| SAR (head) | 0.73 W/kg | 0.35 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 8.1 Oreo | Android 9.0 Pie |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | EMUI 8.1 | One UI |
