How we scoreBlogAdvertise
android.gsdevices · specs · comparisons
  1. android.gs
  2. Compare
  3. Mate Xs vs X Fold3 Pro

Huawei Mate Xs vs Vivo X Fold3 Pro

What Mate Xs does better (4) and where X Fold3 Pro wins (23) — every spec side by side.

Huawei Mate Xs
Huawei · 2020Mate Xs
4.9Score
4 advantages≈ $2,100
vs
Vivo X Fold3 Pro
Vivo · 2024X Fold3 Pro
9.3Score
23 advantages≈ $2,150
Higher score
4.4Display9.4
3.7Performance8.3
4.1Camera9.1
5.4Battery9.5
3.4Features7.4
Dimensions

Size comparison

Mate XsX Fold3 Pro
146.2 × 161.35.4142.4 × 1605.2
Mate XsX Fold3 ProDifference
Height161.3 mm160 mm+1.3 mm
Width146.2 mm142.4 mm+3.8 mm
Thickness5.4 mm5.2 mm+0.2 mm
Weight300 g236 g+64 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Mate Xs better than X Fold3 Pro?

  1. Geekbench 6 (multi-core)12,213 vs 6,791+80%
  2. Storage (base)512 GB vs 256 GB2×
  3. Memory card slotYes · X Fold3 Pro: No
  4. Loudspeaker loudness-27 LUFS vs -27.8 LUFS+-3%

Why is X Fold3 Pro better than Mate Xs?

  1. AnTuTu score459,274 vs 2,066,3224.5×
  2. Refresh rate60 Hz vs 120 Hz2×
  3. RAM8 GB vs 16 GB2×
  4. Wired charging55 W vs 100 W+82%
  5. Measured brightness413 nits vs 2,129 nits5.2×
  6. Battery capacity4,500 mAh vs 5,700 mAh+27%
  7. Storage (max)512 GB vs 1,024 GB2×
  8. Optical stabilisationNo · Mate Xs: Yes
  9. Wireless chargingNo · Mate Xs: Yes
  10. Stereo speakersNo · Mate Xs: Yes
  11. Main camera40 MP vs 50 MP+25%
  12. Weight300 g vs 236 g+27%
Specifications

Side by side

Huawei Mate XsHuawei Mate Xs≈ $2,1004.9
Vivo X Fold3 ProVivo X Fold3 Pro≈ $2,1509.3
Design
Weight300 g236 g
Thickness5.4 mm5.2 mm
Height161.3 mm160 mm
Width146.2 mm142.4 mm
FrameAluminium—
BackAluminiumGlass
Ingress protection—IPX8
Water resistance (IPx)—IPx8
Glass protection—Armor Glass
ColoursInterstellar BlueCelestial Black, White, Lunar White
Display
Screen size8″8″
PanelFoldable OLEDFoldable LTPO AMOLED
OLED panelYesYes
LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz)—Yes
Resolution (width)2,200 px2,200 px
Resolution (height)2,480 px2,480 px
Pixel density414 ppi413 ppi
Refresh rate60 Hz120 Hz
Peak brightness—4,500 nits
Measured brightness413 nits2,129 nits
Screen-to-body ratio86.9%90.6%
HDR—Yes
FoldableYesYes
Performance
ChipsetKirin 990 5GQualcomm SM8650-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
Chip makerKirinQualcomm
Process7 nm4 nm
CPU cores88
CPU frequency2.86 GHz3.3 GHz
GPUMali-G76 MP16Adreno 750
AnTuTu score459,2742,066,322
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)12,2136,791
3DMark Wild Life Extreme—4,714
Memory
RAM8 GB16 GB
Storage (max)512 GB1,024 GB
Storage (base)512 GB256 GB
Storage typeUFS 2.1UFS 4.0
Memory card slotYesNo
Camera
Main camera40 MP50 MP
Main camera aperturef/1.8f/1.7
Main sensor size1/1.7"1/1.3"
Rear cameras33
Optical stabilisationNoYes
Ultra-wide cameraYesYes
Telephoto cameraYesYes
Optical zoom3×3×
Max video4K8K
4K video frame rate30 fps60 fps
Selfie camera—32 MP
4K selfie videoNoNo
Battery
Battery capacity4,500 mAh5,700 mAh
Battery typeLi-PoSi/C
Active use (test)—13.4 h
Wired charging55 W100 W
Charged in 30 min85%97%
Wireless chargingNoYes
Wireless charging power—50 W
Reverse wireless charging—Yes
Connectivity
5GYesYes
eSIMNoNo
Dual SIMYesYes
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 5Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth55.4
NFCYesYes
USBUSB Type-C 3.1USB Type-C 3.2 Gen 2
USB version3.13.2
Video output—Yes
Infrared port—Yes
Dual-band GPSYesYes
Satellite navigationGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSSGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS
Features
Stereo speakersNoYes
3.5 mm headphone jackNoNo
Loudspeaker loudness-27 LUFS-27.8 LUFS
Fingerprint sensorSideUnder display
BarometerYesYes
SensorsFingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometerDual screen fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer
Software
OS at launchAndroid 10Android 14
PlatformAndroidAndroid
InterfaceEMUI 10Funtouch 15 (International)
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare