- android.gs
- Compare
- Mate Xs vs Galaxy Z Flip
Huawei Mate Xs vs Samsung Galaxy Z Flip
What Mate Xs does better (14) and where Galaxy Z Flip wins (9) — every spec side by side.
vs
4.4Display3.4
4.1Camera4.3
5.4Battery2.9
3.4Features3.1
Dimensions
Size comparison
Mate XsGalaxy Z Flip
| Mate Xs | Galaxy Z Flip | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 161.3 mm | 167.3 mm | −6 mm |
| Width | 146.2 mm | 73.6 mm | +72.6 mm |
| Thickness | 5.4 mm | 7.2 mm | −1.8 mm |
| Weight | 300 g | 183 g | +117 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Mate Xs better than Galaxy Z Flip?
- Main camera40 MP vs 12 MP3.3×
- Wired charging55 W vs 15 W3.7×
- Battery capacity4,500 mAh vs 3,300 mAh+36%
- Storage (max)512 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Telephoto cameraYes · Galaxy Z Flip: No
- 5GYes · Galaxy Z Flip: No
- Resolution (width)2,200 px vs 1,080 px2×
- Storage (base)512 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Memory card slotYes · Galaxy Z Flip: No
- Screen size8″ vs 6.7″+19%
- USB version3.1 vs 2+55%
- Rear cameras3 vs 2+50%
Why is Galaxy Z Flip better than Mate Xs?
- Optical stabilisationNo · Mate Xs: Yes
- Wireless chargingNo · Mate Xs: Yes
- Weight300 g vs 183 g+64%
- Measured brightness413 nits vs 596 nits+44%
- 4K video frame rate30 fps vs 60 fps2×
- 4K selfie videoNo · Mate Xs: Yes
- eSIMNo · Mate Xs: Yes
- CPU frequency2.86 GHz vs 2.95 GHz+3%
- Pixel density414 ppi vs 425 ppi+3%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 300 g | 183 g |
| Thickness | 5.4 mm | 7.2 mm |
| Height | 161.3 mm | 167.3 mm |
| Width | 146.2 mm | 73.6 mm |
| Frame | Aluminium | Aluminium |
| Back | Aluminium | Glass |
| Colours | Interstellar Blue | Mirror Black, Mirror Purple, Mirror Gold, Thom Browne Edition |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 8″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | Foldable OLED | Foldable Dynamic AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 2,200 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,480 px | 2,636 px |
| Pixel density | 414 ppi | 425 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Measured brightness | 413 nits | 596 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 86.9% | 82.5% |
| HDR | — | Yes |
| Foldable | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Kirin 990 5G | Qualcomm SM8150 Snapdragon 855+ |
| Chip maker | Kirin | Qualcomm |
| Process | 7 nm | 7 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.86 GHz | 2.95 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G76 MP16 | Adreno 640 |
| AnTuTu score | 459,274 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 12,213 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 512 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 512 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.1 | UFS 3.0 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 40 MP | 12 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.55" |
| Rear cameras | 3 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | Yes | No |
| Optical zoom | 3× | — |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | 60 fps |
| Selfie camera | — | 10 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,500 mAh | 3,300 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 55 W | 15 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 85% | — |
| Wireless charging | No | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | No |
| eSIM | No | Yes |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.1 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 3.1 | 2 |
| Dual-band GPS | Yes | — |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -27 LUFS | — |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Barometer | Yes | Yes |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| SAR (head) | — | 0.37 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 10 | Android 10 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | EMUI 10 | One UI 4.1.1 |
