- android.gs
- Compare
- Mate Xs vs Find N
Huawei Mate Xs vs OPPO Find N
What Mate Xs does better (13) and where Find N wins (12) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
Mate XsFind N
| Mate Xs | Find N | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 161.3 mm | 132.6 mm | +28.7 mm |
| Width | 146.2 mm | 140.2 mm | +6 mm |
| Thickness | 5.4 mm | 8 mm | −2.6 mm |
| Weight | 300 g | 275 g | +25 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Mate Xs better than Find N?
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)12,213 vs 3,4783.5×
- Wired charging55 W vs 33 W+67%
- Optical zoom3× vs 2×+50%
- Storage (base)512 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Memory card slotYes · Find N: No
- Dual SIMYes · Find N: No
- Screen size8″ vs 7.1″+13%
- Pixel density414 ppi vs 370 ppi+12%
- USB version3.1 vs 2+55%
- Charged in 30 min85% vs 55%+55%
- Thickness5.4 mm vs 8 mm+48%
- Resolution (width)2,200 px vs 1,792 px+23%
Why is Find N better than Mate Xs?
- Refresh rate60 Hz vs 120 Hz2×
- AnTuTu score459,274 vs 703,131+53%
- RAM8 GB vs 12 GB+50%
- Optical stabilisationNo · Mate Xs: Yes
- Wireless chargingNo · Mate Xs: Yes
- Stereo speakersNo · Mate Xs: Yes
- Main camera40 MP vs 50 MP+25%
- 4K video frame rate30 fps vs 60 fps2×
- Weight300 g vs 275 g+9%
- Process7 nm vs 5 nm+40%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 5 vs Wi-Fi 6+20%
- Bluetooth5 vs 5.2+4%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 300 g | 275 g |
| Thickness | 5.4 mm | 8 mm |
| Height | 161.3 mm | 132.6 mm |
| Width | 146.2 mm | 140.2 mm |
| Frame | Aluminium | Aluminium |
| Back | Aluminium | Glass |
| Colours | Interstellar Blue | Black, White, Purple |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 8″ | 7.1″ |
| Panel | Foldable OLED | Foldable LTPO AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz) | — | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 2,200 px | 1,792 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,480 px | 1,920 px |
| Pixel density | 414 ppi | 370 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | — | 1,000 nits |
| Measured brightness | 413 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 86.9% | 87.3% |
| HDR | — | Yes |
| Foldable | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Kirin 990 5G | Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888 5G |
| Chip maker | Kirin | Qualcomm |
| Process | 7 nm | 5 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.86 GHz | 2.84 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G76 MP16 | Adreno 660 |
| AnTuTu score | 459,274 | 703,131 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 12,213 | 3,478 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 512 GB | 512 GB |
| Storage (base) | 512 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.1 | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 40 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/1.56" |
| Rear cameras | 3 | 3 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | Yes | Yes |
| Optical zoom | 3× | 2× |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | 60 fps |
| Selfie camera | — | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,500 mAh | 4,500 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 55 W | 33 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 85% | 55% |
| Wireless charging | No | Yes |
| Wireless charging power | — | 15 W |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | No |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5.2 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.1 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 3.1 | 2 |
| Dual-band GPS | Yes | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -27 LUFS | -28.7 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Barometer | Yes | — |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, dual gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 10 | Android 11 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | EMUI 10 | ColorOS 14 |
