- android.gs
- Compare
- Mate X2 vs Mi Mix Fold
Huawei Mate X2 vs Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold
What Mate X2 does better (9) and where Mi Mix Fold wins (9) — every spec side by side.
vs
4.9Display3.1
9.4Camera7.2
5.4Battery8.2
4.7Features5.9
Dimensions
Size comparison
Mate X2Mi Mix Fold
| Mate X2 | Mi Mix Fold | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 161.8 mm | 173.3 mm | −11.5 mm |
| Width | 145.8 mm | 133.4 mm | +12.4 mm |
| Thickness | 8.2 mm | 7.6 mm | +0.6 mm |
| Weight | 295 g | 317 g | −22 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Mate X2 better than Mi Mix Fold?
- Optical zoom10× vs 3×3.3×
- Refresh rate90 Hz vs 60 Hz+50%
- Optical stabilisationYes · Mi Mix Fold: No
- Memory card slotYes · Mi Mix Fold: No
- Rear cameras4 vs 22×
- CPU frequency3.13 GHz vs 2.84 GHz+10%
- Weight295 g vs 317 g+7%
- Pixel density413 ppi vs 387 ppi+7%
- Resolution (width)2,200 px vs 1,860 px+18%
Why is Mi Mix Fold better than Mate X2?
- Main camera50 MP vs 108 MP2.2×
- Battery capacity4,500 mAh vs 5,020 mAh+12%
- RAM12 GB vs 16 GB+33%
- Wired charging55 W vs 67 W+22%
- Max video4K vs 8K
- Selfie camera16 MP vs 20 MP+25%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6 vs Wi-Fi 6E+8%
- Thickness8.2 mm vs 7.6 mm+8%
- Main camera aperturef/1.9 vs f/1.8+6%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 295 g | 317 g |
| Thickness | 8.2 mm | 7.6 mm |
| Height | 161.8 mm | 173.3 mm |
| Width | 145.8 mm | 133.4 mm |
| Frame | Aluminium | Aluminium |
| Back | Glass | Glass |
| Colours | Black, White, Light Blue, Rose Gold, Collector’s Edition Black/White/Red | Black, Ceramic |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 8″ | 8″ |
| Panel | Foldable OLED | Foldable AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 2,200 px | 1,860 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,480 px | 2,480 px |
| Pixel density | 413 ppi | 387 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Peak brightness | — | 900 nits |
| Measured brightness | 542 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 87.3% | 85.9% |
| HDR | — | Yes |
| Foldable | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Kirin 9000 5G | Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888 5G |
| Chip maker | Kirin | Qualcomm |
| Process | 5 nm | 5 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 3.13 GHz | 2.84 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G78 MP24 | Adreno 660 |
| AnTuTu score | 632,818 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 14,393 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 16 GB |
| Storage (max) | 512 GB | 512 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3. | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 108 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.28" | 1/1.52" |
| Rear cameras | 4 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | Yes | Yes |
| Optical zoom | 10× | 3× |
| Max video | 4K | 8K |
| 4K video frame rate | 60 fps | 60 fps |
| Selfie camera | 16 MP | 20 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,500 mAh | 5,020 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 55 W | 67 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 81% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 6E |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.2 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.1 | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 3.1 | — |
| Dual-band GPS | Yes | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -26.8 LUFS | — |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Barometer | Yes | Yes |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 10 | Android 10 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | EMUI 11 | MIUI 12 |
