- android.gs
- Compare
- Mate X2 vs X Fold
Huawei Mate X2 vs Vivo X Fold
What Mate X2 does better (7) and where X Fold wins (9) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
Mate X2X Fold
| Mate X2 | X Fold | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 161.8 mm | 162 mm | −0.2 mm |
| Width | 145.8 mm | 144.9 mm | +0.9 mm |
| Thickness | 8.2 mm | 6.3 mm | +1.9 mm |
| Weight | 295 g | 311 g | −16 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Mate X2 better than X Fold?
- Optical zoom10× vs 5×2×
- Memory card slotYes · X Fold: No
- Dual SIMYes · X Fold: No
- Pixel density413 ppi vs 360 ppi+15%
- Weight295 g vs 311 g+5%
- CPU frequency3.13 GHz vs 3 GHz+4%
- Resolution (width)2,200 px vs 1,916 px+15%
Why is X Fold better than Mate X2?
- Wireless chargingNo · Mate X2: Yes
- Refresh rate90 Hz vs 120 Hz+33%
- Battery capacity4,500 mAh vs 4,600 mAh+2%
- Wired charging55 W vs 66 W+20%
- Max video4K vs 8K
- Thickness8.2 mm vs 6.3 mm+30%
- Process5 nm vs 4 nm+25%
- Main camera aperturef/1.9 vs f/1.8+6%
- USB version3.1 vs 3.2+3%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 295 g | 311 g |
| Thickness | 8.2 mm | 6.3 mm |
| Height | 161.8 mm | 162 mm |
| Width | 145.8 mm | 144.9 mm |
| Frame | Aluminium | — |
| Back | Glass | — |
| Colours | Black, White, Light Blue, Rose Gold, Collector’s Edition Black/White/Red | Black, Blue |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 8″ | 8″ |
| Panel | Foldable OLED | Foldable LTPO AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz) | — | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 2,200 px | 1,916 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,480 px | 2,160 px |
| Pixel density | 413 ppi | 360 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Measured brightness | 542 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 87.3% | 88% |
| HDR | — | Yes |
| Foldable | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Kirin 9000 5G | Qualcomm SM8450 Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 |
| Chip maker | Kirin | Qualcomm |
| Process | 5 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 3.13 GHz | 3 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G78 MP24 | Adreno 730 |
| AnTuTu score | 632,818 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 14,393 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 512 GB | 512 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3. | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.28" | 1/1.57" |
| Rear cameras | 4 | 4 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | Yes | Yes |
| Optical zoom | 10× | 5× |
| Max video | 4K | 8K |
| 4K video frame rate | 60 fps | 60 fps |
| Selfie camera | 16 MP | 16 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,500 mAh | 4,600 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | — |
| Wired charging | 55 W | 66 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 81% |
| Wireless charging | No | Yes |
| Wireless charging power | — | 50 W |
| Reverse wireless charging | — | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | No |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.2 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.1 | USB Type-C 3.2 |
| USB version | 3.1 | 3.2 |
| Dual-band GPS | Yes | — |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -26.8 LUFS | — |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Under display |
| Barometer | Yes | Yes |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 10 | Android 12 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | EMUI 11 | OriginOS Ocean |
