- android.gs
- Compare
- Mate X2 vs Find N3
Huawei Mate X2 vs OPPO Find N3
What Mate X2 does better (6) and where Find N3 wins (19) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
Mate X2Find N3
| Mate X2 | Find N3 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 161.8 mm | 153.4 mm | +8.4 mm |
| Width | 145.8 mm | 143.1 mm | +2.7 mm |
| Thickness | 8.2 mm | 5.8 mm | +2.4 mm |
| Weight | 295 g | 239 g | +56 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Mate X2 better than Find N3?
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)14,393 vs 5,1662.8×
- Optical zoom10× vs 3×3.3×
- Main camera50 MP vs 48 MP+4%
- Memory card slotYes · Find N3: No
- Screen size8″ vs 7.8″+2%
- Rear cameras4 vs 3+33%
Why is Find N3 better than Mate X2?
- AnTuTu score632,818 vs 1,417,8372.2×
- Measured brightness542 nits vs 1,240 nits2.3×
- Storage (max)512 GB vs 1,024 GB2×
- Refresh rate90 Hz vs 120 Hz+33%
- RAM12 GB vs 16 GB+33%
- Battery capacity4,500 mAh vs 4,805 mAh+7%
- Wired charging55 W vs 67 W+22%
- Weight295 g vs 239 g+23%
- 4K selfie videoNo · Mate X2: Yes
- Pixel density413 ppi vs 426 ppi+3%
- CPU frequency3.13 GHz vs 3.2 GHz+2%
- Thickness8.2 mm vs 5.8 mm+41%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 295 g | 239 g |
| Thickness | 8.2 mm | 5.8 mm |
| Height | 161.8 mm | 153.4 mm |
| Width | 145.8 mm | 143.1 mm |
| Frame | Aluminium | Aluminium |
| Back | Glass | Glass |
| Colours | Black, White, Light Blue, Rose Gold, Collector’s Edition Black/White/Red | Black, Green, Gold, Red |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 8″ | 7.8″ |
| Panel | Foldable OLED | Foldable LTPO3 OLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz) | — | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 2,200 px | 2,268 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,480 px | 2,440 px |
| Pixel density | 413 ppi | 426 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | — | 2,800 nits |
| Measured brightness | 542 nits | 1,240 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 87.3% | 89.6% |
| HDR | — | Yes |
| Foldable | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Kirin 9000 5G | Qualcomm SM8550-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 |
| Chip maker | Kirin | Qualcomm |
| Process | 5 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 3.13 GHz | 3.2 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G78 MP24 | Adreno 740 |
| AnTuTu score | 632,818 | 1,417,837 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 14,393 | 5,166 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 16 GB |
| Storage (max) | 512 GB | 1,024 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3. | UFS 4.0 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 48 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.7 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.28" | 1/1.43" |
| Rear cameras | 4 | 3 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | Yes | Yes |
| Optical zoom | 10× | 3× |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 60 fps | 60 fps |
| Selfie camera | 16 MP | 20 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,500 mAh | 4,805 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Active use (test) | — | 11.6 h |
| Wired charging | 55 W | 67 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 105% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.3 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.1 | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 3.1 | — |
| Dual-band GPS | Yes | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -26.8 LUFS | -25.3 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Barometer | Yes | — |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, dual gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 10 | Android 13 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | EMUI 11 | ColorOS 14 |
