- android.gs
- Compare
- Mate 40 vs Axon 20 5G
Huawei Mate 40 vs ZTE Axon 20 5G
What Mate 40 does better (11) and where Axon 20 5G wins (5) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.1Display8.1
8.2Camera8.1
5.7Battery3.2
6.3Features7.1
Dimensions
Size comparison
Mate 40Axon 20 5G
| Mate 40 | Axon 20 5G | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 158.6 mm | 172.1 mm | −13.5 mm |
| Width | 72.5 mm | 77.9 mm | −5.4 mm |
| Thickness | 8.8 mm | 8 mm | +0.8 mm |
| Weight | 188 g | 198 g | −10 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Mate 40 better than Axon 20 5G?
- Telephoto cameraYes · Axon 20 5G: No
- Wireless chargingYes · Axon 20 5G: No
- Wired charging40 W vs 30 W+33%
- CPU frequency3.13 GHz vs 2.4 GHz+30%
- 4K selfie videoYes · Axon 20 5G: No
- 3.5 mm headphone jackYes · Axon 20 5G: No
- Weight188 g vs 198 g+5%
- Rear cameras3 vs 2+50%
- Process5 nm vs 7 nm+40%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6 vs Wi-Fi 5+20%
- Screen-to-body ratio89.3% vs 79.8%+12%
Why is Axon 20 5G better than Mate 40?
- Main camera50 MP vs 64 MP+28%
- Selfie camera13 MP vs 32 MP2.5×
- Screen size6.5″ vs 6.9″+6%
- Thickness8.8 mm vs 8 mm+10%
- Main camera aperturef/1.9 vs f/1.8+6%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 188 g | 198 g |
| Thickness | 8.8 mm | 8 mm |
| Height | 158.6 mm | 172.1 mm |
| Width | 72.5 mm | 77.9 mm |
| Frame | Aluminium | Plastic |
| Back | Glass | Glass |
| Ingress protection | IP53 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx3 | — |
| Colours | Silver, White, Black, Green, Yellow | Black, Gold, Blue, Purple, Sunrise Yellow |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.5″ | 6.9″ |
| Panel | OLED | OLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,376 px | 2,460 px |
| Pixel density | 402 ppi | 400 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 90 Hz |
| Measured brightness | — | 406 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 89.3% | 79.8% |
| HDR | Yes | — |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Kirin 9000E 5G | Qualcomm SM7250 Snapdragon 765G 5G |
| Chip maker | Kirin | Qualcomm |
| Process | 5 nm | 7 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 3.13 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G78 MP22 | Adreno 620 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 320,399 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 1,957 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | — |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 64 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.28" | 1/1.72" |
| Rear cameras | 3 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | Yes | No |
| Optical zoom | 3× | — |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 60 fps | 60 fps |
| Selfie camera | 13 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,200 mAh | 4,220 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Ion |
| Wired charging | 40 W | 30 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 60% |
| Wireless charging | Yes | No |
| Wireless charging power | 40 W | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.1 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.1 | USB Type-C 3.1 |
| USB version | 3.1 | 3.1 |
| Dual-band GPS | Yes | — |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -27.3 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 10 | Android 10 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | EMUI 11 | Mifavor UI 10.5 |
