- android.gs
- Compare
- Mate 40 vs 8T+ 5G
Huawei Mate 40 vs OnePlus 8T+ 5G
What Mate 40 does better (11) and where 8T+ 5G wins (11) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
Mate 408T+ 5G
| Mate 40 | 8T+ 5G | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 158.6 mm | 160.7 mm | −2.1 mm |
| Width | 72.5 mm | 74.1 mm | −1.6 mm |
| Thickness | 8.8 mm | 8.4 mm | +0.4 mm |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Mate 40 better than 8T+ 5G?
- Telephoto cameraYes · 8T+ 5G: No
- Wireless chargingYes · 8T+ 5G: No
- Main camera50 MP vs 48 MP+4%
- Memory card slotYes · 8T+ 5G: No
- 4K selfie videoYes · 8T+ 5G: No
- Dual SIMYes · 8T+ 5G: No
- 3.5 mm headphone jackYes · 8T+ 5G: No
- CPU frequency3.13 GHz vs 2.84 GHz+10%
- Rear cameras3 vs 2+50%
- Process5 nm vs 7 nm+40%
- Screen-to-body ratio89.3% vs 87%+3%
Why is 8T+ 5G better than Mate 40?
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx3 vs IPx82.7×
- Wired charging40 W vs 65 W+62%
- RAM8 GB vs 12 GB+50%
- Optical stabilisationNo · Mate 40: Yes
- Stereo speakersNo · Mate 40: Yes
- Refresh rate90 Hz vs 120 Hz+33%
- Battery capacity4,200 mAh vs 4,500 mAh+7%
- Storage (base)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Selfie camera13 MP vs 16 MP+23%
- Main camera aperturef/1.9 vs f/1.7+12%
- Thickness8.8 mm vs 8.4 mm+5%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 188 g | — |
| Thickness | 8.8 mm | 8.4 mm |
| Height | 158.6 mm | 160.7 mm |
| Width | 72.5 mm | 74.1 mm |
| Frame | Aluminium | Aluminium |
| Back | Glass | Glass |
| Ingress protection | IP53 | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx3 | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | — | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Colours | Silver, White, Black, Green, Yellow | Aquamarine Green, Lunar Silver |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.5″ | 6.6″ |
| Panel | OLED | Fluid AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,376 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 402 ppi | 402 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 89.3% | 87% |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Kirin 9000E 5G | Qualcomm SM8250 Snapdragon 865 5G |
| Chip maker | Kirin | Qualcomm |
| Process | 5 nm | 7 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 3.13 GHz | 2.84 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G78 MP22 | Adreno 650 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 48 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.7 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.28" | 1/2.0" |
| Rear cameras | 3 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | Yes | No |
| Optical zoom | 3× | — |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 60 fps | 60 fps |
| Selfie camera | 13 MP | 16 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,200 mAh | 4,500 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 40 W | 65 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 77% |
| Wireless charging | Yes | No |
| Wireless charging power | 40 W | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | No |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.1 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.1 | USB Type-C 3.1 |
| USB version | 3.1 | 3.1 |
| Dual-band GPS | Yes | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Under display |
| Barometer | — | Yes |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer (market dependant) |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 10 | Android 11 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | EMUI 11 | OxygenOS 11 |
