- android.gs
- Compare
- Mate 40 Pro vs X51 5G
Huawei Mate 40 Pro vs Vivo X51 5G
What Mate 40 Pro does better (17) and where X51 5G wins (7) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.8Display7.2
9.0Camera9.4
6.9Battery3.9
9.5Features7.1
Dimensions
Size comparison
Mate 40 ProX51 5G
| Mate 40 Pro | X51 5G | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 162.9 mm | 158.5 mm | +4.4 mm |
| Width | 75.5 mm | 72.8 mm | +2.7 mm |
| Thickness | 9.1 mm | 8 mm | +1.1 mm |
| Weight | 212 g | 182 g | +30 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Mate 40 Pro better than X51 5G?
- Wired charging66 W vs 33 W2×
- Storage (max)512 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Wireless chargingYes · X51 5G: No
- Stereo speakersYes · X51 5G: No
- Main camera50 MP vs 48 MP+4%
- CPU frequency3.13 GHz vs 2.4 GHz+30%
- Memory card slotYes · X51 5G: No
- 4K video frame rate60 fps vs 30 fps2×
- 4K selfie videoYes · X51 5G: No
- eSIMYes · X51 5G: No
- Pixel density456 ppi vs 398 ppi+15%
- Screen size6.8″ vs 6.6″+3%
Why is X51 5G better than Mate 40 Pro?
- Optical stabilisationNo · Mate 40 Pro: Yes
- Selfie camera13 MP vs 32 MP2.5×
- Storage (base)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Weight212 g vs 182 g+17%
- Rear cameras3 vs 4+33%
- Main camera aperturef/1.9 vs f/1.6+19%
- Thickness9.1 mm vs 8 mm+14%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 212 g | 182 g |
| Thickness | 9.1 mm | 8 mm |
| Height | 162.9 mm | 158.5 mm |
| Width | 75.5 mm | 72.8 mm |
| Frame | Aluminium | Aluminium |
| Back | Glass | Glass |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | — |
| Colours | Mystic Silver, White, Black, Green, Yellow | Gray |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.6″ |
| Panel | OLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,344 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,772 px | 2,376 px |
| Pixel density | 456 ppi | 398 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 90 Hz |
| Measured brightness | 807 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 94.1% | 90.6% |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Kirin 9000 5G | Qualcomm SM7250 Snapdragon 765G 5G |
| Chip maker | Kirin | Qualcomm |
| Process | 5 nm | 7 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 3.13 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G78 MP24 | Adreno 620 |
| AnTuTu score | 686,835 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 3,704 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 512 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 2.1 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 48 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.6 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.28" | — |
| Rear cameras | 3 | 4 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | Yes | Yes |
| Optical zoom | 5× | 5× |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 60 fps | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 13 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,400 mAh | 4,315 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | — |
| Wired charging | 66 W | 33 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 57% |
| Wireless charging | Yes | No |
| Wireless charging power | 50 W | — |
| Reverse wireless charging | Yes | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | Yes | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.1 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.1 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 3.1 | 2 |
| Dual-band GPS | Yes | — |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -24.9 LUFS | — |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Under display |
| 3D face unlock | Yes | — |
| Barometer | Yes | — |
| Sensors | Face ID, fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, barometer, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 10 | Android 10 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | EMUI 11 | Funtouch 10.0 |
