- android.gs
- Compare
- U23 Pro vs Moto G84
HTC U23 Pro vs Motorola Moto G84
What U23 Pro does better (13) and where Moto G84 wins (7) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
U23 ProMoto G84
| U23 Pro | Moto G84 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 166.6 mm | 160 mm | +6.6 mm |
| Width | 77.1 mm | 74.4 mm | +2.7 mm |
| Thickness | 8.9 mm | 7.6 mm | +1.3 mm |
| Weight | 205 g | 167 g | +38 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is U23 Pro better than Moto G84?
- Main camera108 MP vs 50 MP2.2×
- AnTuTu score534,643 vs 389,015+37%
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)2,947 vs 1,824+62%
- Wireless chargingYes · Moto G84: No
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx7 vs IPx4+75%
- Max video4K vs 1080p
- Selfie camera32 MP vs 16 MP2×
- CPU frequency2.4 GHz vs 2.2 GHz+9%
- Screen size6.7″ vs 6.5″+3%
- Process4 nm vs 6 nm+50%
- USB version3 vs 2+50%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6 vs Wi-Fi 5+20%
Why is Moto G84 better than U23 Pro?
- Stereo speakersNo · U23 Pro: Yes
- Battery capacity4,600 mAh vs 5,000 mAh+9%
- Measured brightness727 nits vs 996 nits+37%
- Weight205 g vs 167 g+23%
- Pixel density393 ppi vs 405 ppi+3%
- Thickness8.9 mm vs 7.6 mm+17%
- Loudspeaker loudness-26 LUFS vs -24.9 LUFS+-4%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 205 g | 167 g |
| Thickness | 8.9 mm | 7.6 mm |
| Height | 166.6 mm | 160 mm |
| Width | 77.1 mm | 74.4 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Plastic | Eco leather |
| Ingress protection | IP67 | IP54 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx7 | IPx4 |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus | — |
| Colours | Snow White, Coffee Black | Marshmallow Blue, Midnight Blue, Viva Magenta |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.5″ |
| Panel | OLED | P-OLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,400 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 393 ppi | 405 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | — | 1,300 nits |
| Measured brightness | 727 nits | 996 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 84.4% | 85.7% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7450-AB Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Qualcomm |
| Process | 4 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.4 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 644 | Adreno 619 |
| AnTuTu score | 534,643 | 389,015 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 2,947 | 1,824 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 108 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.7 | f/1.9 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.67" | 1/1.5" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 1080p |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | — |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 16 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,600 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Ion | Li-Po |
| Active use (test) | — | 12.5 h |
| Wired charging | 30 W | 30 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 54% |
| Wireless charging | Yes | No |
| Wireless charging power | 15 W | — |
| Reverse wireless charging | Yes | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.1 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 3 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -26 LUFS | -24.9 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 13 | Android 13 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | — | My UX |
