- android.gs
- Compare
- U20 5G vs Galaxy S10 Plus
HTC U20 5G vs Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
What U20 5G does better (10) and where Galaxy S10 Plus wins (19) — every spec side by side.
vs
5.0Display6.5
6.8Camera6.4
4.6Battery3.0
7.1Features5.8
Dimensions
Size comparison
U20 5GGalaxy S10 Plus
| U20 5G | Galaxy S10 Plus | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 171.2 mm | 157.6 mm | +13.6 mm |
| Width | 78.1 mm | 74.1 mm | +4 mm |
| Thickness | 9.4 mm | 7.8 mm | +1.6 mm |
| Weight | 216 g | 175 g | +40 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is U20 5G better than Galaxy S10 Plus?
- Main camera48 MP vs 16 MP3×
- Battery capacity5,000 mAh vs 4,100 mAh+22%
- 5GYes · Galaxy S10 Plus: No
- NFCYes · Galaxy S10 Plus: No
- Wired charging18 W vs 15 W+20%
- Selfie camera32 MP vs 10 MP3.2×
- Storage (base)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
- Ultra-wide cameraYes · Galaxy S10 Plus: No
- Screen size6.8″ vs 6.4″+6%
- Process7 nm vs 8 nm+14%
Why is Galaxy S10 Plus better than U20 5G?
- Storage (max)256 GB vs 1,024 GB4×
- RAM8 GB vs 12 GB+50%
- OLED panelNo · U20 5G: Yes
- Optical stabilisationNo · U20 5G: Yes
- Wireless chargingNo · U20 5G: Yes
- Stereo speakersNo · U20 5G: Yes
- Pixel density387 ppi vs 522 ppi+35%
- Weight216 g vs 175 g+23%
- 4K video frame rate30 fps vs 60 fps2×
- 4K selfie videoNo · U20 5G: Yes
- 3.5 mm headphone jackNo · U20 5G: Yes
- CPU frequency2.4 GHz vs 2.7 GHz+13%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 216 g | 175 g |
| Thickness | 9.4 mm | 7.8 mm |
| Height | 171.2 mm | 157.6 mm |
| Width | 78.1 mm | 74.1 mm |
| Back | — | Glass |
| Ingress protection | — | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | — | Gorilla Glass 6 |
| Colours | Green, White | Black, Blue, Green, Red |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.4″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | No | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,440 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,400 px | 3,040 px |
| Pixel density | 387 ppi | 522 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Peak brightness | — | 900 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 787 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 83.5% | 87.6% |
| HDR | — | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7250 Snapdragon 765G 5G | Samsung Exynos 9820 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Samsung |
| Process | 7 nm | 8 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.4 GHz | 2.7 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 620 | Mali G76 MP12 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 782,239 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 2,593 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 952 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 1,024 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 2.1 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 48 MP | 16 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.5 |
| Main sensor size | 1/2.0" | 1/2.55" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 3 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Optical zoom | — | 2× |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | 60 fps |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 10 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 4,100 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 18 W | 15 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 50% |
| Wireless charging | No | Yes |
| Wireless charging power | — | 15 W |
| Reverse wireless charging | — | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5 |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 3.1 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | Yes |
| Fingerprint sensor | Rear | Under display |
| Barometer | — | Yes |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, SAR | fingerprint |
| SAR (head) | — | 0.52 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 10 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | — | One UI |
