- android.gs
- Compare
- U20 5G vs Reno4 Pro 5G
HTC U20 5G vs OPPO Reno4 Pro 5G
What U20 5G does better (4) and where Reno4 Pro 5G wins (13) — every spec side by side.
vs
5.0Display6.4
6.8Camera8.1
4.6Battery4.2
7.1Features8.1
Dimensions
Size comparison
U20 5GReno4 Pro 5G
| U20 5G | Reno4 Pro 5G | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 171.2 mm | 159.6 mm | +11.6 mm |
| Width | 78.1 mm | 72.5 mm | +5.6 mm |
| Thickness | 9.4 mm | 7.6 mm | +1.8 mm |
| Weight | 216 g | 172 g | +44 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is U20 5G better than Reno4 Pro 5G?
- Battery capacity5,000 mAh vs 4,000 mAh+25%
- Storage (base)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
- Memory card slotYes · Reno4 Pro 5G: No
- Screen size6.8″ vs 6.6″+4%
Why is Reno4 Pro 5G better than U20 5G?
- Wired charging18 W vs 65 W3.6×
- Refresh rate60 Hz vs 90 Hz+50%
- RAM8 GB vs 12 GB+50%
- OLED panelNo · U20 5G: Yes
- Optical stabilisationNo · U20 5G: Yes
- Telephoto cameraNo · U20 5G: Yes
- Stereo speakersNo · U20 5G: Yes
- Weight216 g vs 172 g+25%
- Pixel density387 ppi vs 402 ppi+4%
- Rear cameras2 vs 3+50%
- Thickness9.4 mm vs 7.6 mm+24%
- Screen-to-body ratio83.5% vs 89.5%+7%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 216 g | 172 g |
| Thickness | 9.4 mm | 7.6 mm |
| Height | 171.2 mm | 159.6 mm |
| Width | 78.1 mm | 72.5 mm |
| Frame | — | Aluminium |
| Back | — | Glass |
| Glass protection | — | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Colours | Green, White | Galactic Blue, Space Black, White, Pink, Green |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.6″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | No | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,400 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 387 ppi | 402 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 90 Hz |
| Peak brightness | — | 500 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 845 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 83.5% | 89.5% |
| HDR | — | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7250 Snapdragon 765G 5G | Qualcomm SM7250 Snapdragon 765G 5G |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Qualcomm |
| Process | 7 nm | 7 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.4 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 620 | Adreno 620 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 317,139 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 1,805 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 2.1 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 48 MP | 48 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.7 |
| Main sensor size | 1/2.0" | 1/2.0" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 3 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | Yes |
| Optical zoom | — | 2× |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 4,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 18 W | 65 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 120% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5.1 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Dual-band GPS | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -24.8 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Rear | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, SAR | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 10 | Android 10 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | — | ColorOS 7.2 |
