- android.gs
- Compare
- Cyber 16 Pro vs Redmi Note 14 4G
Hotwav Cyber 16 Pro vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 4G
What Cyber 16 Pro does better (5) and where Redmi Note 14 4G wins (2) — every spec side by side.
vs
5.7Display8.4
7.0Camera6.4
Why is Cyber 16 Pro better than Redmi Note 14 4G?
- RAM24 GB vs 8 GB3×
- Storage (max)512 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Battery capacity6,280 mAh vs 5,500 mAh+14%
- Storage (base)512 GB vs 128 GB4×
- Selfie camera32 MP vs 20 MP+60%
Why is Redmi Note 14 4G better than Cyber 16 Pro?
- OLED panelNo · Cyber 16 Pro: Yes
- Bluetooth5.1 vs 5.3+4%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | — | 196 g |
| Thickness | — | 8.2 mm |
| Height | — | 163.3 mm |
| Width | — | 76.6 mm |
| Frame | — | Aluminium |
| Back | — | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | — | IP54 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx4 |
| Glass protection | — | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Colours | Black | Midnight Black, Mist Purple, Ocean Blue, Lime Green |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.6″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | — | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | No | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,408 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 401 ppi | 395 ppi |
| Refresh rate | — | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | — | 1,800 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 1,303 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | — | 85.9% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Helio G100 | Mediatek Helio G99 Ultra |
| Chip maker | — | MediaTek |
| Process | — | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.2 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| GPU | — | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 570,767 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 1,926 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 24 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 512 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 512 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | — | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 108 MP | 108 MP |
| Main camera aperture | — | f/1.7 |
| Main sensor size | — | 1/1.67" |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | — | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 20 MP |
| 4K selfie video | — | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 6,280 mAh | 5,500 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Active use (test) | — | 12.8 h |
| Wired charging | — | 33 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 38% |
| Wireless charging | — | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | No |
| eSIM | — | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | — | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5.3 |
| NFC | — | Yes |
| USB | — | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | — | 2 |
| Infrared port | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | — | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | — | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | — | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -24.8 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | — | Under display |
| Sensors | — | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass, proximity |
| SAR (head) | — | 1 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 15 | Android 14 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | — | HyperOS |
| Major OS updates promised | — | 4 |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | — | B |
| Battery charge cycles | — | 1,600 |
| Endurance per cycle | — | 49 h |
| Repairability class | — | C |
| Drop resistance class | — | D |
Related comparisons
vs
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 4GvsXiaomi Redmi Note 157.38.6
vs
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13vsXiaomi Redmi Note 14 4G6.77.3
vs
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 4GvsInfinix Hot 60 Pro+7.37.2
vs
ZTE Focus 2 5GvsXiaomi Redmi Note 14 4G7.27.3
vs
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 4GvsTecno Spark 40 Pro+7.37.2
vs
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 4GvsXiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G7.36.7

