- android.gs
- Compare
- X9d vs Redmi K80 Ultra
Honor X9d vs Xiaomi Redmi K80 Ultra
What X9d does better (6) and where Redmi K80 Ultra wins (15) — every spec side by side.
vs
9.5Display9.7
6.9Performance9.3
8.5Camera9.0
9.2Battery9.5
8.9Features9.3
Dimensions
Size comparison
X9dRedmi K80 Ultra
| X9d | Redmi K80 Ultra | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 161.9 mm | 163.1 mm | −1.2 mm |
| Width | 76.1 mm | 77.9 mm | −1.8 mm |
| Thickness | 7.8 mm | 8.2 mm | −0.4 mm |
| Weight | 193 g | 219 g | −26 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is X9d better than Redmi K80 Ultra?
- Main camera108 MP vs 50 MP2.2×
- Peak brightness6,000 nits vs 3,200 nits+88%
- Battery capacity8,300 mAh vs 7,410 mAh+12%
- Weight193 g vs 219 g+13%
- Main camera aperturef/1.8 vs f/1.9+6%
- Thickness7.8 mm vs 8.2 mm+5%
Why is Redmi K80 Ultra better than X9d?
- AnTuTu score977,304 vs 2,926,6683×
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)3,159 vs 9,1742.9×
- Wired charging66 W vs 100 W+52%
- Storage (max)512 GB vs 1,024 GB2×
- RAM12 GB vs 16 GB+33%
- Refresh rate120 Hz vs 144 Hz+20%
- CPU frequency2.3 GHz vs 3.63 GHz+58%
- Max video4K vs 8K
- 4K video frame rate30 fps vs 60 fps2×
- Pixel density427 ppi vs 447 ppi+5%
- Process4 nm vs 3 nm+33%
- Selfie camera16 MP vs 20 MP+25%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 193 g | 219 g |
| Thickness | 7.8 mm | 8.2 mm |
| Height | 161.9 mm | 163.1 mm |
| Width | 76.1 mm | 77.9 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Aluminium |
| Back | Plastic | Glass |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | Aluminosilicate glass | Scratch/drop-resistant glass |
| Colours | Reddish Brown, Midnight Black, Sunrise Gold, Forest Green | Gray, White, Blue, Green |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | OLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,200 px | 1,280 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,640 px | 2,772 px |
| Pixel density | 427 ppi | 447 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 6,000 nits | 3,200 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 90.9% | 90.2% |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 4 | Mediatek Dimensity 9400+ |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | MediaTek |
| Process | 4 nm | 3 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.3 GHz | 3.63 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 810 | Immortalis-G925 |
| AnTuTu score | 977,304 | 2,926,668 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 3,159 | 9,174 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 16 GB |
| Storage (max) | 512 GB | 1,024 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 4.1 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 108 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.9 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.67" | 1/1.55" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 8K |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | 60 fps |
| Selfie camera | 16 MP | 20 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 8,300 mAh | 7,410 mAh |
| Battery type | Si/C | Si/C |
| Wired charging | 66 W | 100 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 50% | — |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | — |
| Infrared port | — | Yes |
| Dual-band GPS | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Under display, ultrasonic |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, compass, gyro, proximity | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 15 | Android 15 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | MagicOS 9.0 | HyperOS 2 |
