- android.gs
- Compare
- X9d vs V60e
Honor X9d vs Vivo V60e
What X9d does better (11) and where V60e wins (8) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
X9dV60e
| X9d | V60e | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 161.9 mm | 163.5 mm | −1.6 mm |
| Width | 76.1 mm | 77 mm | −0.9 mm |
| Thickness | 7.8 mm | 7.5 mm | +0.3 mm |
| Weight | 193 g | 190 g | +3 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is X9d better than V60e?
- Battery capacity8,300 mAh vs 6,500 mAh+28%
- Storage (max)512 GB vs 256 GB2×
- AnTuTu score977,304 vs 859,863+14%
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)3,159 vs 2,906+9%
- Storage (base)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
- Peak brightness6,000 nits vs 5,000 nits+20%
- Pixel density427 ppi vs 388 ppi+10%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6 vs Wi-Fi 5+20%
- Resolution (width)1,200 px vs 1,080 px+11%
- Main camera aperturef/1.8 vs f/1.9+6%
- Screen-to-body ratio90.9% vs 88.1%+3%
Why is V60e better than X9d?
- Main camera108 MP vs 200 MP+85%
- Wired charging66 W vs 90 W+36%
- Selfie camera16 MP vs 50 MP3.1×
- 4K selfie videoNo · X9d: Yes
- CPU frequency2.3 GHz vs 2.5 GHz+9%
- Charged in 30 min50% vs 71%+42%
- Thickness7.8 mm vs 7.5 mm+4%
- Bluetooth5.2 vs 5.4+4%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 193 g | 190 g |
| Thickness | 7.8 mm | 7.5 mm |
| Height | 161.9 mm | 163.5 mm |
| Width | 76.1 mm | 77 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Plastic | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | Aluminosilicate glass | Diamond Shield Glass |
| Colours | Reddish Brown, Midnight Black, Sunrise Gold, Forest Green | Elite Purple, Noble Gold |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,200 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,640 px | 2,392 px |
| Pixel density | 427 ppi | 388 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 6,000 nits | 5,000 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 90.9% | 88.1% |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 4 | Mediatek Dimensity 7360 Turbo |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | MediaTek |
| Process | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.3 GHz | 2.5 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 810 | Mali-G615 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | 977,304 | 859,863 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 3,159 | 2,906 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 512 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 108 MP | 200 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.9 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.67" | 1/1.56" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 16 MP | 50 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 8,300 mAh | 6,500 mAh |
| Battery type | Si/C | Si/C |
| Wired charging | 66 W | 90 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 50% | 71% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, compass, gyro, proximity | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| SAR (head) | — | 1.11 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 15 | Android 15 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | MagicOS 9.0 | Funtouch 15 |
| Major OS updates promised | — | 3 |
