- android.gs
- Compare
- X9d vs WP55 Ultra
Honor X9d vs Oukitel WP55 Ultra
What X9d does better (15) and where WP55 Ultra wins (7) — every spec side by side.
vs
9.5Display5.5
8.5Camera7.0
9.2Battery8.7
8.9Features7.6
Dimensions
Size comparison
X9dWP55 Ultra
| X9d | WP55 Ultra | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 161.9 mm | 172.2 mm | −10.3 mm |
| Width | 76.1 mm | 81 mm | −4.9 mm |
| Thickness | 7.8 mm | 15.3 mm | −7.5 mm |
| Weight | 193 g | 368 g | −175 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is X9d better than WP55 Ultra?
- Wired charging66 W vs 33 W2×
- Peak brightness6,000 nits vs 450 nits13.3×
- OLED panelYes · WP55 Ultra: No
- Optical stabilisationYes · WP55 Ultra: No
- Stereo speakersYes · WP55 Ultra: No
- Weight193 g vs 368 g+90%
- Ultra-wide cameraYes · WP55 Ultra: No
- Thickness7.8 mm vs 15.3 mm+96%
- Pixel density427 ppi vs 400 ppi+7%
- Screen size6.8″ vs 6.6″+3%
- Process4 nm vs 6 nm+50%
- Main camera aperturef/1.8 vs f/2.2+22%
Why is WP55 Ultra better than X9d?
- Battery capacity8,300 mAh vs 11,000 mAh+33%
- RAM12 GB vs 16 GB+33%
- Storage (base)256 GB vs 512 GB2×
- Memory card slotNo · X9d: Yes
- Selfie camera16 MP vs 32 MP2×
- CPU frequency2.3 GHz vs 2.5 GHz+9%
- Rear cameras2 vs 3+50%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 193 g | 368 g |
| Thickness | 7.8 mm | 15.3 mm |
| Height | 161.9 mm | 172.2 mm |
| Width | 76.1 mm | 81 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | — |
| Back | Plastic | — |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | Aluminosilicate glass | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Colours | Reddish Brown, Midnight Black, Sunrise Gold, Forest Green | Black, Red, Gray |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.6″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | Yes | No |
| Resolution (width) | 1,200 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,640 px | 2,408 px |
| Pixel density | 427 ppi | 400 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 6,000 nits | 450 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 90.9% | 75.2% |
| HDR | Yes | — |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 4 | Mediatek Dimensity 7025 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | MediaTek |
| Process | 4 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.3 GHz | 2.5 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 810 | IMG BXM-8-256 |
| AnTuTu score | 977,304 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 3,159 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 16 GB |
| Storage (max) | 512 GB | 512 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 512 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | — |
| Memory card slot | No | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 108 MP | 108 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/2.2 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.67" | 1/1.8" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 3 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | — |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | — |
| Selfie camera | 16 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 8,300 mAh | 11,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Si/C | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 66 W | 33 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 50% | — |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.2 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Dual-band GPS | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, compass, gyro, proximity | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 15 | Android 15 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | MagicOS 9.0 | — |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | — | B |
| Battery charge cycles | — | 1,000 |
| Endurance per cycle | — | 106 h |
| Repairability class | — | C |
| Drop resistance class | — | A |
