- android.gs
- Compare
- X9d vs WP200 Pro
Honor X9d vs Oukitel WP200 Pro
What X9d does better (12) and where WP200 Pro wins (7) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
X9dWP200 Pro
| X9d | WP200 Pro | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 161.9 mm | 163.6 mm | −1.7 mm |
| Width | 76.1 mm | 77.9 mm | −1.8 mm |
| Thickness | 7.8 mm | 13.7 mm | −5.9 mm |
| Weight | 193 g | 311 g | −118 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is X9d better than WP200 Pro?
- Peak brightness6,000 nits vs 500 nits12×
- Optical stabilisationYes · WP200 Pro: No
- Stereo speakersYes · WP200 Pro: No
- Wired charging66 W vs 45 W+47%
- Weight193 g vs 311 g+61%
- Rear cameras2 vs 12×
- Ultra-wide cameraYes · WP200 Pro: No
- Pixel density427 ppi vs 394 ppi+8%
- Thickness7.8 mm vs 13.7 mm+76%
- Resolution (width)1,200 px vs 1,080 px+11%
- Screen-to-body ratio90.9% vs 84.8%+7%
- Main camera aperturef/1.8 vs f/1.9+6%
Why is WP200 Pro better than X9d?
- RAM12 GB vs 24 GB2×
- Storage (max)512 GB vs 1,024 GB2×
- Battery capacity8,300 mAh vs 8,800 mAh+6%
- Storage (base)256 GB vs 1,024 GB4×
- CPU frequency2.3 GHz vs 3.1 GHz+35%
- Memory card slotNo · X9d: Yes
- Selfie camera16 MP vs 32 MP2×
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 193 g | 311 g |
| Thickness | 7.8 mm | 13.7 mm |
| Height | 161.9 mm | 163.6 mm |
| Width | 76.1 mm | 77.9 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | — |
| Back | Plastic | — |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | Aluminosilicate glass | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Colours | Reddish Brown, Midnight Black, Sunrise Gold, Forest Green | Black |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,200 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,640 px | 2,412 px |
| Pixel density | 427 ppi | 394 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 6,000 nits | 500 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 90.9% | 84.8% |
| HDR | Yes | — |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 4 | Mediatek Dimensity 8200 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | MediaTek |
| Process | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.3 GHz | 3.1 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 810 | Mali-G610 MC6 |
| AnTuTu score | 977,304 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 3,159 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 24 GB |
| Storage (max) | 512 GB | 1,024 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 1,024 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | — |
| Memory card slot | No | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 108 MP | 108 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.9 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.67" | 1/1.8" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 16 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 8,300 mAh | 8,800 mAh |
| Battery type | Si/C | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 66 W | 45 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 50% | — |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.3 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, compass, gyro, proximity | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, compass, gyro |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 15 | Android 15 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | MagicOS 9.0 | — |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | — | B |
| Battery charge cycles | — | 1,000 |
| Endurance per cycle | — | 86 h |
| Repairability class | — | C |
| Drop resistance class | — | A |
