- android.gs
- Compare
- X9d vs Ace 5 Ultra
Honor X9d vs OnePlus Ace 5 Ultra
What X9d does better (6) and where Ace 5 Ultra wins (14) — every spec side by side.
vs
9.5Display9.5
6.9Performance9.2
8.5Camera8.6
9.2Battery9.4
8.9Features8.3
Dimensions
Size comparison
X9dAce 5 Ultra
| X9d | Ace 5 Ultra | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 161.9 mm | 163.4 mm | −1.5 mm |
| Width | 76.1 mm | 77 mm | −0.9 mm |
| Thickness | 7.8 mm | 8.1 mm | −0.3 mm |
| Weight | 193 g | 206 g | −13 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is X9d better than Ace 5 Ultra?
- Main camera108 MP vs 50 MP2.2×
- Peak brightness6,000 nits vs 1,400 nits4.3×
- Battery capacity8,300 mAh vs 6,700 mAh+24%
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx8 vs IPx5+60%
- Weight193 g vs 206 g+7%
- Thickness7.8 mm vs 8.1 mm+4%
Why is Ace 5 Ultra better than X9d?
- AnTuTu score977,304 vs 2,948,3043×
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)3,159 vs 8,5642.7×
- Wired charging66 W vs 100 W+52%
- Storage (max)512 GB vs 1,024 GB2×
- RAM12 GB vs 16 GB+33%
- CPU frequency2.3 GHz vs 3.73 GHz+62%
- Refresh rate120 Hz vs 144 Hz+20%
- 4K video frame rate30 fps vs 60 fps2×
- Pixel density427 ppi vs 450 ppi+5%
- Charged in 30 min50% vs 77%+54%
- Process4 nm vs 3 nm+33%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6 vs Wi-Fi 7+17%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 193 g | 206 g |
| Thickness | 7.8 mm | 8.1 mm |
| Height | 161.9 mm | 163.4 mm |
| Width | 76.1 mm | 77 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | — |
| Back | Plastic | — |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | IP65 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx5 |
| Glass protection | Aluminosilicate glass | Crystal Shield Glass |
| Colours | Reddish Brown, Midnight Black, Sunrise Gold, Forest Green | Blue, Black, Titanium |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,200 px | 1,272 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,640 px | 2,800 px |
| Pixel density | 427 ppi | 450 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 6,000 nits | 1,400 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 90.9% | 90.1% |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 4 | Mediatek Dimensity 9400+ |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | MediaTek |
| Process | 4 nm | 3 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.3 GHz | 3.73 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 810 | Immortalis-G925 MC12 |
| AnTuTu score | 977,304 | 2,948,304 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 3,159 | 8,564 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 5,144 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 16 GB |
| Storage (max) | 512 GB | 1,024 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 4.0 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 108 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.67" | 1/1.56" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | 60 fps |
| Selfie camera | 16 MP | 16 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 8,300 mAh | 6,700 mAh |
| Battery type | Si/C | Si/C |
| Wired charging | 66 W | 100 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 50% | 77% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | — | Yes |
| Dual-band GPS | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, compass, gyro, proximity | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 15 | Android 15 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | MagicOS 9.0 | ColorOS 15 |
