- android.gs
- Compare
- X8d vs T4R
Honor X8d vs Vivo T4R
What X8d does better (10) and where T4R wins (10) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
X8dT4R
| X8d | T4R | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 162.9 mm | 163.3 mm | −0.4 mm |
| Width | 76.3 mm | 76.7 mm | −0.4 mm |
| Thickness | 7.5 mm | 7.4 mm | +0.1 mm |
| Weight | 188 g | 184 g | +4 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is X8d better than T4R?
- Main camera108 MP vs 50 MP2.2×
- Battery capacity7,000 mAh vs 5,700 mAh+23%
- Storage (max)512 GB vs 256 GB2×
- NFCYes · T4R: No
- Peak brightness3,000 nits vs 1,800 nits+67%
- Wired charging45 W vs 44 W+2%
- Memory card slotYes · T4R: No
- Rear cameras2 vs 12×
- Ultra-wide cameraYes · T4R: No
- CPU frequency2.9 GHz vs 2.6 GHz+12%
Why is T4R better than X8d?
- RAM8 GB vs 12 GB+50%
- 5GNo · X8d: Yes
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx5 vs IPx8+60%
- Max video1080p vs 4K
- Selfie camera16 MP vs 32 MP2×
- 4K selfie videoNo · X8d: Yes
- Weight188 g vs 184 g+2%
- Process6 nm vs 4 nm+50%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 5 vs Wi-Fi 6+20%
- Bluetooth5 vs 5.4+8%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 188 g | 184 g |
| Thickness | 7.5 mm | 7.4 mm |
| Height | 162.9 mm | 163.3 mm |
| Width | 76.3 mm | 76.7 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | — |
| Back | Plastic | — |
| Ingress protection | IP65 | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx5 | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | Aluminosilicate glass | Diamond Shield Glass |
| Colours | Light Blue, Velvet Grey, Velvet Black | Arctic White, Twilight Blue |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,392 px | 2,392 px |
| Pixel density | 388 ppi | 388 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 3,000 nits | 1,800 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 89.2% | 88.5% |
| HDR | — | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6225-AF Snapdragon 6s 4G Gen 2 | Mediatek Dimensity 7400 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | MediaTek |
| Process | 6 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.9 GHz | 2.6 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 610 | Mali-G615 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | 505,682 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 1,532 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 512 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 108 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.67" | 1/1.95" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | — | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 16 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 7,000 mAh | 5,700 mAh |
| Battery type | Si/C | Li-Ion |
| Wired charging | 45 W | 44 W |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | Yes | — |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, compass, proximity (ultrasonic) | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 16 | Android 15 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | MagicOS 10 | Funtouch 15 |
| Major OS updates promised | — | 2 |
