- android.gs
- Compare
- X8d vs Armor 30
Honor X8d vs UleFone Armor 30
What X8d does better (9) and where Armor 30 wins (10) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
X8dArmor 30
| X8d | Armor 30 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 162.9 mm | 181.3 mm | −18.4 mm |
| Width | 76.3 mm | 84.9 mm | −8.6 mm |
| Thickness | 7.5 mm | 21.2 mm | −13.7 mm |
| Weight | 188 g | 506 g | −318 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is X8d better than Armor 30?
- Main camera108 MP vs 50 MP2.2×
- Weight188 g vs 506 g2.7×
- Peak brightness3,000 nits vs 700 nits4.3×
- OLED panelYes · Armor 30: No
- Optical stabilisationYes · Armor 30: No
- Thickness7.5 mm vs 21.2 mm2.8×
- CPU frequency2.9 GHz vs 2.2 GHz+32%
- Screen-to-body ratio89.2% vs 74.5%+20%
- Main camera aperturef/1.8 vs f/2+11%
Why is Armor 30 better than X8d?
- Battery capacity7,000 mAh vs 12,800 mAh+83%
- RAM8 GB vs 12 GB+50%
- Wired charging45 W vs 66 W+47%
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx5 vs IPx8+60%
- Storage (base)128 GB vs 512 GB4×
- Selfie camera16 MP vs 32 MP2×
- 3.5 mm headphone jackNo · X8d: Yes
- Screen size6.8″ vs 7″+3%
- Rear cameras2 vs 3+50%
- Bluetooth5 vs 5.2+4%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 188 g | 506 g |
| Thickness | 7.5 mm | 21.2 mm |
| Height | 162.9 mm | 181.3 mm |
| Width | 76.3 mm | 84.9 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | — |
| Back | Plastic | — |
| Ingress protection | IP65 | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx5 | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | Aluminosilicate glass | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Colours | Light Blue, Velvet Grey, Velvet Black | Black |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 7″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | Yes | No |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,392 px | 2,460 px |
| Pixel density | 388 ppi | 387 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 3,000 nits | 700 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 89.2% | 74.5% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6225-AF Snapdragon 6s 4G Gen 2 | Mediatek Helio G100 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | MediaTek |
| Process | 6 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.9 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 610 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | 505,682 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 1,532 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 512 GB | 512 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 512 GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 108 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/2 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.67" | 1/1.3" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 3 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 16 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 7,000 mAh | 12,800 mAh |
| Battery type | Si/C | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 45 W | 66 W |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5.2 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | Yes | — |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | Yes |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Barometer | — | Yes |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, compass, proximity (ultrasonic) | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 16 | Android 15 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | MagicOS 10 | — |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | — | A |
| Battery charge cycles | — | 1,000 |
| Endurance per cycle | — | 138 h |
| Repairability class | — | C |
| Drop resistance class | — | A |
