- android.gs
- Compare
- X8d vs Pova Curve
Honor X8d vs Tecno Pova Curve
What X8d does better (11) and where Pova Curve wins (9) — every spec side by side.
8.9Display9.2
4.0Performance6.4
8.4Camera6.3
8.8Battery8.0
5.8Features7.5
Dimensions
Size comparison
X8dPova Curve
| X8d | Pova Curve | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 162.9 mm | 164.3 mm | −1.4 mm |
| Width | 76.3 mm | 74.6 mm | +1.7 mm |
| Thickness | 7.5 mm | 7.5 mm | = |
| Weight | 188 g | 188 g | −0 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is X8d better than Pova Curve?
- Main camera108 MP vs 64 MP+69%
- Peak brightness3,000 nits vs 1,300 nits2.3×
- Battery capacity7,000 mAh vs 5,500 mAh+27%
- Storage (max)512 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Optical stabilisationYes · Pova Curve: No
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx5 vs IPx4+25%
- Memory card slotYes · Pova Curve: No
- Rear cameras2 vs 12×
- Ultra-wide cameraYes · Pova Curve: No
- CPU frequency2.9 GHz vs 2.5 GHz+16%
- Selfie camera16 MP vs 13 MP+23%
Why is Pova Curve better than X8d?
- AnTuTu score505,682 vs 906,240+79%
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)1,532 vs 3,0972×
- 5GNo · X8d: Yes
- Refresh rate120 Hz vs 144 Hz+20%
- Max video1080p vs 4K
- 4K selfie videoNo · X8d: Yes
- Process6 nm vs 4 nm+50%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 5 vs Wi-Fi 6+20%
- Bluetooth5 vs 5.4+8%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 188 g | 188 g |
| Thickness | 7.5 mm | 7.5 mm |
| Height | 162.9 mm | 164.3 mm |
| Width | 76.3 mm | 74.6 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Plastic | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP65 | IP64 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx5 | IPx4 |
| Glass protection | Aluminosilicate glass | Corning Gorilla Glass 7i |
| Colours | Light Blue, Velvet Grey, Velvet Black | Neon Cyan, Magic Silver, Geek Black |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,392 px | 2,436 px |
| Pixel density | 388 ppi | 393 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 3,000 nits | 1,300 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 89.2% | 89.7% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6225-AF Snapdragon 6s 4G Gen 2 | Mediatek Dimensity 7300 Ultimate |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | MediaTek |
| Process | 6 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.9 GHz | 2.5 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 610 | Mali-G615 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | 505,682 | 906,240 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 1,532 | 3,097 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 512 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 108 MP | 64 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.67" | 1/1.73" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | — | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 16 MP | 13 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 7,000 mAh | 5,500 mAh |
| Battery type | Si/C | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 45 W | 45 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 100% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | Yes | — |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, compass, proximity (ultrasonic) | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 16 | Android 15 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | MagicOS 10 | HIOS 15 |
