- android.gs
- Compare
- X8d vs Narzo 90
Honor X8d vs Realme Narzo 90
What X8d does better (9) and where Narzo 90 wins (10) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
X8dNarzo 90
| X8d | Narzo 90 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 162.9 mm | 158.4 mm | +4.5 mm |
| Width | 76.3 mm | 75.2 mm | +1.1 mm |
| Thickness | 7.5 mm | 7.8 mm | −0.3 mm |
| Weight | 188 g | 181 g | +7 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is X8d better than Narzo 90?
- Main camera108 MP vs 50 MP2.2×
- Storage (max)512 GB vs 128 GB4×
- Optical stabilisationYes · Narzo 90: No
- NFCYes · Narzo 90: No
- Rear cameras2 vs 12×
- Ultra-wide cameraYes · Narzo 90: No
- CPU frequency2.9 GHz vs 2.5 GHz+16%
- Screen size6.8″ vs 6.6″+3%
- Thickness7.5 mm vs 7.8 mm+4%
Why is Narzo 90 better than X8d?
- 5GNo · X8d: Yes
- AnTuTu score505,682 vs 588,662+16%
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)1,532 vs 2,130+39%
- Wired charging45 W vs 60 W+33%
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx5 vs IPx8+60%
- Selfie camera16 MP vs 50 MP3.1×
- Peak brightness3,000 nits vs 4,000 nits+33%
- Weight188 g vs 181 g+4%
- Pixel density388 ppi vs 397 ppi+2%
- Bluetooth5 vs 5.3+6%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 188 g | 181 g |
| Thickness | 7.5 mm | 7.8 mm |
| Height | 162.9 mm | 158.4 mm |
| Width | 76.3 mm | 75.2 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Plastic | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP65 | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx5 | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | Aluminosilicate glass | Asahi Dragontrail Star D+ |
| Colours | Light Blue, Velvet Grey, Velvet Black | Victory Gold, Carbon Black |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.6″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,392 px | 2,372 px |
| Pixel density | 388 ppi | 397 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 3,000 nits | 4,000 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 89.2% | 88.2% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6225-AF Snapdragon 6s 4G Gen 2 | Mediatek Dimensity 6400 Max |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | MediaTek |
| Process | 6 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.9 GHz | 2.5 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 610 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | 505,682 | 588,662 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 1,532 | 2,130 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 512 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 108 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.67" | 1/2.88" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 16 MP | 50 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 7,000 mAh | 7,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Si/C | Si/C |
| Wired charging | 45 W | 60 W |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5.3 |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, compass, proximity (ultrasonic) | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 16 | Android 15 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | MagicOS 10 | Realme UI 6.0 |
| Major OS updates promised | — | 3 |
