- android.gs
- Compare
- X8d vs Moto G67 Power
Honor X8d vs Motorola Moto G67 Power
What X8d does better (12) and where Moto G67 Power wins (9) — every spec side by side.
vs
8.9Display6.8
4.0Performance6.6
8.4Camera7.1
8.8Battery8.1
5.8Features6.8
Dimensions
Size comparison
X8dMoto G67 Power
| X8d | Moto G67 Power | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 162.9 mm | 166.2 mm | −3.3 mm |
| Width | 76.3 mm | 76.5 mm | −0.2 mm |
| Thickness | 7.5 mm | 8.6 mm | −1.1 mm |
| Weight | 188 g | 210 g | −22 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is X8d better than Moto G67 Power?
- Main camera108 MP vs 50 MP2.2×
- Peak brightness3,000 nits vs 1,050 nits2.9×
- Wired charging45 W vs 30 W+50%
- OLED panelYes · Moto G67 Power: No
- Storage (max)512 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Optical stabilisationYes · Moto G67 Power: No
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx5 vs IPx4+25%
- CPU frequency2.9 GHz vs 2.4 GHz+21%
- Memory card slotYes · Moto G67 Power: No
- Weight188 g vs 210 g+12%
- Thickness7.5 mm vs 8.6 mm+15%
- Screen-to-body ratio89.2% vs 86.1%+4%
Why is Moto G67 Power better than X8d?
- AnTuTu score505,682 vs 848,362+68%
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)1,532 vs 2,988+95%
- RAM8 GB vs 12 GB+50%
- 5GNo · X8d: Yes
- Max video1080p vs 4K
- Selfie camera16 MP vs 32 MP2×
- 4K selfie videoNo · X8d: Yes
- 3.5 mm headphone jackNo · X8d: Yes
- Process6 nm vs 4 nm+50%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 188 g | 210 g |
| Thickness | 7.5 mm | 8.6 mm |
| Height | 162.9 mm | 166.2 mm |
| Width | 76.3 mm | 76.5 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Plastic | Eco leather |
| Ingress protection | IP65 | IP64 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx5 | IPx4 |
| Glass protection | Aluminosilicate glass | Corning Gorilla Glass 7i |
| Colours | Light Blue, Velvet Grey, Velvet Black | Pantone: Cilantro, Parachute Purple, Blue Curacao |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | Yes | No |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,392 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 388 ppi | 391 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 3,000 nits | 1,050 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 89.2% | 86.1% |
| HDR | — | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6225-AF Snapdragon 6s 4G Gen 2 | Qualcomm SM7435-AB Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Qualcomm |
| Process | 6 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.9 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 610 | Adreno 710 |
| AnTuTu score | 505,682 | 848,362 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 1,532 | 2,988 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 512 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 108 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.67" | 1/1.95" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | — | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 16 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 7,000 mAh | 7,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Si/C | Si/C |
| Wired charging | 45 W | 30 W |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5.1 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | Yes | — |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | Yes |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, compass, proximity (ultrasonic) | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 16 | Android 15 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | MagicOS 10 | Hello UI |
