- android.gs
- Compare
- X8c vs Poco M7 Plus
Honor X8c vs Xiaomi Poco M7 Plus
What X8c does better (14) and where Poco M7 Plus wins (7) — every spec side by side.
vs
8.8Display7.4
3.9Performance4.9
8.8Camera4.6
6.4Battery8.3
4.5Features5.4
Dimensions
Size comparison
X8cPoco M7 Plus
| X8c | Poco M7 Plus | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 161.1 mm | 168.5 mm | −7.4 mm |
| Width | 74.6 mm | 80.5 mm | −5.9 mm |
| Thickness | 7.1 mm | 8.4 mm | −1.3 mm |
| Weight | 174 g | 217 g | −43 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is X8c better than Poco M7 Plus?
- Main camera108 MP vs 50 MP2.2×
- Peak brightness2,800 nits vs 850 nits3.3×
- Storage (max)512 GB vs 128 GB4×
- OLED panelYes · Poco M7 Plus: No
- Optical stabilisationYes · Poco M7 Plus: No
- Selfie camera50 MP vs 8 MP6.2×
- Wired charging35 W vs 33 W+6%
- Weight174 g vs 217 g+25%
- CPU frequency2.8 GHz vs 2.3 GHz+22%
- Rear cameras2 vs 12×
- Ultra-wide cameraYes · Poco M7 Plus: No
- Pixel density394 ppi vs 374 ppi+5%
Why is Poco M7 Plus better than X8c?
- Battery capacity5,000 mAh vs 7,000 mAh+40%
- AnTuTu score466,230 vs 595,016+28%
- 5GNo · X8c: Yes
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)1,543 vs 2,228+44%
- Refresh rate120 Hz vs 144 Hz+20%
- Memory card slotNo · X8c: Yes
- Screen size6.7″ vs 6.9″+3%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 174 g | 217 g |
| Thickness | 7.1 mm | 8.4 mm |
| Height | 161.1 mm | 168.5 mm |
| Width | 74.6 mm | 80.5 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Silicone polymer | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP64 | IP64 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | IPx4 |
| Glass protection | — | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Colours | Marrs Green, Midnight Black, Moonlight White, Cloud Purple | Chrome Silver, Aqua Blue, Carbon Black |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.9″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | Yes | No |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,412 px | 2,340 px |
| Pixel density | 394 ppi | 374 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 2,800 nits | 850 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 89.9% | 86.2% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 685 | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 6s Gen 3 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Qualcomm |
| Process | 6 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.8 GHz | 2.3 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 610 | Adreno 619 |
| AnTuTu score | 466,230 | 595,016 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 1,543 | 2,228 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 512 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | No | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 108 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.67" | — |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 50 MP | 8 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 7,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Si/C |
| Wired charging | 35 W | 33 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 64% | — |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5.1 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass, proximity (ultrasonic) | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, compass |
| SAR (head) | — | 0.86 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 15 | Android 15 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | MagicOS 9 | HyperOS 2 |
| Major OS updates promised | — | 2 |
