- android.gs
- Compare
- X8c vs Y400 Pro
Honor X8c vs Vivo Y400 Pro
What X8c does better (10) and where Y400 Pro wins (11) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
X8cY400 Pro
| X8c | Y400 Pro | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 161.1 mm | 163.8 mm | −2.7 mm |
| Width | 74.6 mm | 75 mm | −0.4 mm |
| Thickness | 7.1 mm | 7.5 mm | −0.4 mm |
| Weight | 174 g | 182 g | −8 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is X8c better than Y400 Pro?
- Main camera108 MP vs 50 MP2.2×
- Storage (max)512 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Optical stabilisationYes · Y400 Pro: No
- NFCYes · Y400 Pro: No
- Rear cameras2 vs 12×
- Ultra-wide cameraYes · Y400 Pro: No
- CPU frequency2.8 GHz vs 2.5 GHz+12%
- Weight174 g vs 182 g+5%
- Selfie camera50 MP vs 32 MP+56%
- Thickness7.1 mm vs 7.5 mm+6%
Why is Y400 Pro better than X8c?
- Wired charging35 W vs 90 W2.6×
- 5GNo · X8c: Yes
- Stereo speakersNo · X8c: Yes
- Battery capacity5,000 mAh vs 5,500 mAh+10%
- Peak brightness2,800 nits vs 4,500 nits+61%
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx4 vs IPx5+25%
- Max video1080p vs 4K
- 4K selfie videoNo · X8c: Yes
- Process6 nm vs 4 nm+50%
- Charged in 30 min64% vs 79%+23%
- Bluetooth5 vs 5.4+8%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 174 g | 182 g |
| Thickness | 7.1 mm | 7.5 mm |
| Height | 161.1 mm | 163.8 mm |
| Width | 74.6 mm | 75 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Silicone polymer | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP64 | IP65 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | IPx5 |
| Colours | Marrs Green, Midnight Black, Moonlight White, Cloud Purple | Fest Gold, Freestyle White, Nebula Purple |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,412 px | 2,392 px |
| Pixel density | 394 ppi | 388 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 2,800 nits | 4,500 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 89.9% | 90.3% |
| HDR | — | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 685 | Mediatek Dimensity 7300 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | MediaTek |
| Process | 6 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.8 GHz | 2.5 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 610 | Mali-G615 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | 466,230 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 1,543 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 512 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 108 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.67" | 1/1.95" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | — | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 50 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,500 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Ion |
| Wired charging | 35 W | 90 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 64% | 79% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass, proximity (ultrasonic) | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| SAR (head) | — | 0.85 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 15 | Android 15 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | MagicOS 9 | Funtouch 15 |
