- android.gs
- Compare
- X8c vs Super 26 Ultra
Honor X8c vs itel Super 26 Ultra
What X8c does better (9) and where Super 26 Ultra wins (9) — every spec side by side.
vs
8.8Display9.5
8.8Camera5.9
6.4Battery7.0
4.5Features4.4
Dimensions
Size comparison
X8cSuper 26 Ultra
| X8c | Super 26 Ultra | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 161.1 mm | 164 mm | −2.9 mm |
| Width | 74.6 mm | 75.8 mm | −1.2 mm |
| Thickness | 7.1 mm | 6.8 mm | +0.3 mm |
| Weight | 174 g | 168 g | +6 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is X8c better than Super 26 Ultra?
- Main camera108 MP vs 50 MP2.2×
- Wired charging35 W vs 18 W+94%
- Storage (max)512 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Optical stabilisationYes · Super 26 Ultra: No
- CPU frequency2.8 GHz vs 2.2 GHz+27%
- Rear cameras2 vs 12×
- Ultra-wide cameraYes · Super 26 Ultra: No
- Selfie camera50 MP vs 32 MP+56%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 5 vs Wi-Fi 4+25%
Why is Super 26 Ultra better than X8c?
- Battery capacity5,000 mAh vs 6,000 mAh+20%
- Peak brightness2,800 nits vs 4,500 nits+61%
- Refresh rate120 Hz vs 144 Hz+20%
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx4 vs IPx5+25%
- Memory card slotNo · X8c: Yes
- Weight174 g vs 168 g+4%
- Screen-to-body ratio89.9% vs 112.7%+25%
- Main camera aperturef/1.8 vs f/1.6+12%
- Thickness7.1 mm vs 6.8 mm+4%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 174 g | 168 g |
| Thickness | 7.1 mm | 6.8 mm |
| Height | 161.1 mm | 164 mm |
| Width | 74.6 mm | 75.8 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | — |
| Back | Silicone polymer | — |
| Ingress protection | IP64 | IP65 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | IPx5 |
| Glass protection | — | Corning Gorilla Glass 7i |
| Colours | Marrs Green, Midnight Black, Moonlight White, Cloud Purple | Silver, Blue, Gold, Silver/Gold |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,412 px | 2,436 px |
| Pixel density | 394 ppi | 392 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 2,800 nits | 4,500 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 89.9% | 112.7% |
| HDR | — | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 685 | Unisoc T7300 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Unisoc |
| Process | 6 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.8 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 610 | Mali-G57 MP2 |
| AnTuTu score | 466,230 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 1,543 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 512 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | — |
| Memory card slot | No | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 108 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.6 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.67" | — |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 50 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 6,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | — |
| Wired charging | 35 W | 18 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 64% | — |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 4 |
| Bluetooth | 5 | — |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | — |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass, proximity (ultrasonic) | Fingerprint (under display, optical), unspecified sensors |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 15 | Android 15 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | MagicOS 9 | — |
