- android.gs
- Compare
- X8a vs Galaxy A54
Honor X8a vs Samsung Galaxy A54
What X8a does better (6) and where Galaxy A54 wins (23) — every spec side by side.
vs
4.8Display7.4
3.1Performance4.7
7.0Camera8.3
3.2Battery3.2
5.0Features8.5
Dimensions
Size comparison
X8aGalaxy A54
| X8a | Galaxy A54 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 162.9 mm | 158.2 mm | +4.7 mm |
| Width | 74.5 mm | 76.7 mm | −2.2 mm |
| Thickness | 7.5 mm | 8.2 mm | −0.7 mm |
| Weight | 179 g | 202 g | −23 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is X8a better than Galaxy A54?
- Main camera100 MP vs 50 MP2×
- RAM12 GB vs 8 GB+50%
- Weight179 g vs 202 g+13%
- Screen size6.7″ vs 6.4″+5%
- Thickness7.5 mm vs 8.2 mm+9%
- Screen-to-body ratio89.6% vs 82.9%+8%
Why is Galaxy A54 better than X8a?
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)1,217 vs 2,7032.2×
- AnTuTu score339,004 vs 506,678+49%
- Peak brightness450 nits vs 1,000 nits2.2×
- Measured brightness478 nits vs 980 nits2.1×
- OLED panelNo · X8a: Yes
- Optical stabilisationNo · X8a: Yes
- 5GNo · X8a: Yes
- Stereo speakersNo · X8a: Yes
- Battery capacity4,500 mAh vs 5,000 mAh+11%
- Refresh rate90 Hz vs 120 Hz+33%
- Wired charging22 W vs 25 W+11%
- Process12 nm vs 5 nm2.4×
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 179 g | 202 g |
| Thickness | 7.5 mm | 8.2 mm |
| Height | 162.9 mm | 158.2 mm |
| Width | 74.5 mm | 76.7 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Plastic | Glass |
| Ingress protection | — | IP67 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx7 |
| Glass protection | — | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Colours | Cyan Lake, Titanium Silver, Midnight Black | Lime, Graphite, Violet, White |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.4″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| OLED panel | No | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,388 px | 2,340 px |
| Pixel density | 391 ppi | 403 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 450 nits | 1,000 nits |
| Measured brightness | 478 nits | 980 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 89.6% | 82.9% |
| HDR | — | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6769H Helio G88 | Exynos 1380 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Exynos |
| Process | 12 nm | 5 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 | Mali-G68 MP5 |
| AnTuTu score | 339,004 | 506,678 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 1,217 | 2,703 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 808 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | eMMC 5.1 | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card slot | No | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 100 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | — | 1/1.56" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | — | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 16 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,500 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Ion |
| Active use (test) | — | 11.2 h |
| Wired charging | 22 W | 25 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 50% | 56% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | Yes |
| eSIM | No | Yes |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5.3 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -26.6 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Under display |
| Barometer | — | Yes |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass, barometer (USA only) |
| SAR (head) | — | 0.69 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 12 | Android 13 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | Magic UI 6.1 | One UI 8.5 |
| Major OS updates promised | — | 4 |
