- android.gs
- Compare
- X80 Pro Max vs Pova 8 Pro
Honor X80 Pro Max vs Tecno Pova 8 Pro
What X80 Pro Max does better (6) and where Pova 8 Pro wins (10) — every spec side by side.
vs
9.2Display9.6
7.3Performance7.1
7.1Camera8.0
9.6Battery8.4
8.9Features8.9
Dimensions
Size comparison
X80 Pro MaxPova 8 Pro
| X80 Pro Max | Pova 8 Pro | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 162.2 mm | 162.5 mm | −0.3 mm |
| Width | 77 mm | 77.3 mm | −0.3 mm |
| Thickness | 8.1 mm | 7.4 mm | +0.7 mm |
| Weight | 203 g | 189 g | +14 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is X80 Pro Max better than Pova 8 Pro?
- Battery capacity11,000 mAh vs 6,500 mAh+69%
- Wired charging90 W vs 45 W2×
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)3,498 vs 3,200+9%
- Pixel density452 ppi vs 429 ppi+5%
- Bluetooth6 vs 5.4+11%
- Resolution (width)1,280 px vs 1,208 px+6%
Why is Pova 8 Pro better than X80 Pro Max?
- Peak brightness2,000 nits vs 4,500 nits2.2×
- Refresh rate120 Hz vs 144 Hz+20%
- Storage (base)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Memory card slotNo · X80 Pro Max: Yes
- Rear cameras1 vs 22×
- Ultra-wide cameraNo · X80 Pro Max: Yes
- Weight203 g vs 189 g+7%
- Selfie camera8 MP vs 13 MP+62%
- Thickness8.1 mm vs 7.4 mm+9%
- Main camera aperturef/1.9 vs f/1.8+6%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 203 g | 189 g |
| Thickness | 8.1 mm | 7.4 mm |
| Height | 162.2 mm | 162.5 mm |
| Width | 77 mm | 77.3 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Silicone polymer | — |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | Aluminosilicate glass | Corning Gorilla Glass 7i |
| Colours | Black, Orange/Gold, Red, Opal White | Arc White, Graphite Black, Tundra Green, Tonino Lamborghini Black |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,280 px | 1,208 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,788 px | 2,644 px |
| Pixel density | 452 ppi | 429 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 2,000 nits | 4,500 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 90.2% | 89.2% |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6850 Snapdragon 6 Gen 5 | Mediatek Dimensity 7400 Ultimate |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | MediaTek |
| Process | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.6 GHz | 2.6 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 812 | Mali-G615 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | 1,012,134 | 994,646 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 3,498 | 3,200 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 512 GB | 512 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | No | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | — | 1/1.56" |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 8 MP | 13 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 11,000 mAh | 6,500 mAh |
| Battery type | Si/C | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 90 W | 45 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 56% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Wireless charging power | — | 30 W |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 6 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| Dual-band GPS | Yes | — |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, compass, gyro, proximity (ultrasound) | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 16 | Android 16 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | MagicOS 10 | HIOS 16 |
