- android.gs
- Compare
- X8 vs Galaxy XCover6 Pro
Honor X8 vs Samsung Galaxy XCover6 Pro
What X8 does better (5) and where Galaxy XCover6 Pro wins (14) — every spec side by side.
vs
5.0Display5.8
3.4Performance5.2
6.9Camera6.7
2.9Battery3.0
4.1Features8.4
Dimensions
Size comparison
X8Galaxy XCover6 Pro
| X8 | Galaxy XCover6 Pro | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 163.4 mm | 168.8 mm | −5.4 mm |
| Width | 74.7 mm | 79.9 mm | −5.2 mm |
| Thickness | 7.5 mm | 9.9 mm | −2.4 mm |
| Weight | 177 g | 235 g | −58 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is X8 better than Galaxy XCover6 Pro?
- Main camera64 MP vs 50 MP+28%
- Weight177 g vs 235 g+33%
- Thickness7.5 mm vs 9.9 mm+32%
- Selfie camera16 MP vs 13 MP+23%
- Screen-to-body ratio89.1% vs 77.8%+15%
Why is Galaxy XCover6 Pro better than X8?
- AnTuTu score407,835 vs 697,431+71%
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)1,574 vs 2,842+81%
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx2 vs IPx84×
- 5GNo · X8: Yes
- Refresh rate90 Hz vs 120 Hz+33%
- Wired charging22 W vs 25 W+11%
- Memory card slotNo · X8: Yes
- Max video1080p vs 4K
- Measured brightness466 nits vs 493 nits+6%
- Pixel density391 ppi vs 400 ppi+2%
- USB version2 vs 3.2+60%
- Charged in 30 min50% vs 70%+40%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 177 g | 235 g |
| Thickness | 7.5 mm | 9.9 mm |
| Height | 163.4 mm | 168.8 mm |
| Width | 74.7 mm | 79.9 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Plastic | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP52 | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx2 | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | — | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus+ |
| Colours | Titanium Silver, Midnight Black, Ocean Blue | Black |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.6″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | PLS LCD |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,388 px | 2,408 px |
| Pixel density | 391 ppi | 400 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 500 nits | 500 nits |
| Measured brightness | 466 nits | 493 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 89.1% | 77.8% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 680 4G | Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Qualcomm |
| Process | 6 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.4 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 610 | Adreno 642L |
| AnTuTu score | 407,835 | 697,431 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 1,574 | 2,842 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 6 GB | 6 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.1 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | No | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 64 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | — | 1/2.76" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | — | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 16 MP | 13 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,000 mAh | 4,050 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 22 W | 25 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 50% | 70% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 6E |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5.2 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 3.2 |
| USB version | 2 | 3.2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Barometer | — | Yes |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| SAR (head) | — | 1.48 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 11 | Android 12 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | Magic UI 7.1 | One UI 8.0 |
