- android.gs
- Compare
- X7e Plus 4G vs Redmi Note 15
Honor X7e Plus 4G vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 15
What X7e Plus 4G does better (4) and where Redmi Note 15 wins (18) — every spec side by side.
vs
6.6Display8.5
5.1Camera8.6
9.0Battery7.6
8.3Features7.7
Dimensions
Size comparison
X7e Plus 4GRedmi Note 15
| X7e Plus 4G | Redmi Note 15 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 168.3 mm | 164 mm | +4.3 mm |
| Width | 78.5 mm | 75.4 mm | +3.1 mm |
| Thickness | 8.3 mm | 7.4 mm | +0.9 mm |
| Weight | 218 g | 178 g | +40 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is X7e Plus 4G better than Redmi Note 15?
- Battery capacity8,100 mAh vs 5,520 mAh+47%
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx8 vs IPx6+33%
- Storage (base)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
- CPU frequency2.8 GHz vs 2.4 GHz+17%
Why is Redmi Note 15 better than X7e Plus 4G?
- RAM6 GB vs 12 GB2×
- Peak brightness1,020 nits vs 3,200 nits3.1×
- OLED panelNo · X7e Plus 4G: Yes
- Storage (max)256 GB vs 512 GB2×
- Optical stabilisationNo · X7e Plus 4G: Yes
- Pixel density254 ppi vs 388 ppi+53%
- Selfie camera5 MP vs 20 MP4×
- Weight218 g vs 178 g+23%
- Memory card slotNo · X7e Plus 4G: Yes
- Rear cameras1 vs 22×
- Ultra-wide cameraNo · X7e Plus 4G: Yes
- Max video1080p vs 4K
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 218 g | 178 g |
| Thickness | 8.3 mm | 7.4 mm |
| Height | 168.3 mm | 164 mm |
| Width | 78.5 mm | 75.4 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Plastic | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | IP66 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx6 |
| Glass protection | — | Scratch/drop-resistant glass |
| Colours | Sunrise Orange, Desert Gold, Velvet Black | Black, Glacier Blue, Mist Purple |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.9″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | TFT LCD | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | No | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 720 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 1,592 px | 2,392 px |
| Pixel density | 254 ppi | 388 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,020 nits | 3,200 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 1,524 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 86.5% | 89.7% |
| HDR | — | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 685 | Qualcomm SM6475-AB Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Qualcomm |
| Process | 6 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.8 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 610 | Adreno 710 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 637,266 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 2,958 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 861 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 6 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 512 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | No | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 108 MP | 108 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.7 |
| Main sensor size | — | 1/1.67" |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | — | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 5 MP | 20 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 8,100 mAh | 5,520 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Si/C |
| Active use (test) | — | 14.2 h |
| Wired charging | 45 W | 45 W |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | — | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 4.2 | 5.1 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -23.4 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| SAR (head) | — | 1 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 16 | Android 15 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | MagicOS 10 | HyperOS 2 |
| Major OS updates promised | — | 4 |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | — | B |
| Battery charge cycles | — | 1,000 |
| Endurance per cycle | — | 51 h |
| Repairability class | — | C |
| Drop resistance class | — | A |
Related comparisons
vs
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 4GvsXiaomi Redmi Note 157.38.6
vs
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5GvsXiaomi Redmi Note 157.78.6
vs
Samsung Galaxy A37vsXiaomi Redmi Note 158.68.6
vs
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15vsTecno Camon 50 4G8.68.5
vs
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15vsTecno Pova Curve 28.68.7
vs
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15vsTecno Camon 50 Pro 4G8.68.6

