- android.gs
- Compare
- X7c vs Moto G (2025)
Honor X7c vs Motorola Moto G (2025)
What X7c does better (11) and where Moto G (2025) wins (8) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.0Display6.3
4.8Performance3.8
4.1Camera7.3
7.6Battery5.5
6.2Features7.4
Dimensions
Size comparison
X7cMoto G (2025)
| X7c | Moto G (2025) | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 166.9 mm | 167.1 mm | −0.2 mm |
| Width | 76.8 mm | 76.3 mm | +0.5 mm |
| Thickness | 8.2 mm | 8.2 mm | = |
| Weight | 193 g | 193 g | = |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is X7c better than Moto G (2025)?
- RAM8 GB vs 4 GB2×
- Storage (max)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
- AnTuTu score571,597 vs 526,717+9%
- Battery capacity5,200 mAh vs 5,000 mAh+4%
- Wired charging35 W vs 30 W+17%
- Pixel density389 ppi vs 262 ppi+48%
- Storage (base)256 GB vs 64 GB4×
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)2,104 vs 2,023+4%
- Resolution (width)1,080 px vs 720 px+50%
- Process4 nm vs 6 nm+50%
- Screen-to-body ratio86.8% vs 84.9%+2%
Why is Moto G (2025) better than X7c?
- Optical stabilisationNo · X7c: Yes
- Stereo speakersNo · X7c: Yes
- Selfie camera5 MP vs 16 MP3.2×
- Peak brightness850 nits vs 1,100 nits+29%
- Memory card slotNo · X7c: Yes
- eSIMNo · X7c: Yes
- CPU frequency2.2 GHz vs 2.4 GHz+9%
- Bluetooth5 vs 5.3+6%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 193 g | 193 g |
| Thickness | 8.2 mm | 8.2 mm |
| Height | 166.9 mm | 167.1 mm |
| Width | 76.8 mm | 76.3 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Plastic | Eco leather |
| Ingress protection | IP64 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | — |
| Glass protection | Aluminosilicate glass | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Colours | Moonlight White, Forest Green | Forest Gray, Sapphire Blue |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | TFT LCD | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 720 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,412 px | 1,604 px |
| Pixel density | 389 ppi | 262 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 850 nits | 1,100 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 86.8% | 84.9% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM4450 Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 | Mediatek Dimensity 6300 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | MediaTek |
| Process | 4 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.2 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 613 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | 571,597 | 526,717 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 2,104 | 2,023 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 4 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 64 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | No | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | — | 1/2.76" |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 5 MP | 16 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,200 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 35 W | 30 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 38% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | Yes |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5.3 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Barometer | — | Yes |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 14 | Android 15 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | MagicOS 8 | Hello UI |
| Major OS updates promised | — | 2 |
