- android.gs
- Compare
- X7c vs Note 50 4G
Honor X7c vs Infinix Note 50 4G
What X7c does better (6) and where Note 50 4G wins (12) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.0Display9.2
4.8Performance4.4
4.1Camera7.1
7.6Battery8.4
6.2Features4.4
Dimensions
Size comparison
X7cNote 50 4G
| X7c | Note 50 4G | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 166.9 mm | 163.3 mm | +3.6 mm |
| Width | 76.8 mm | 74.4 mm | +2.4 mm |
| Thickness | 8.2 mm | 7.6 mm | +0.6 mm |
| Weight | 193 g | 199 g | −6 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is X7c better than Note 50 4G?
- 5GYes · Note 50 4G: No
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)2,104 vs 1,946+8%
- 3.5 mm headphone jackYes · Note 50 4G: No
- Weight193 g vs 199 g+3%
- Process4 nm vs 6 nm+50%
- Main camera aperturef/1.8 vs f/1.9+6%
Why is Note 50 4G better than X7c?
- OLED panelNo · X7c: Yes
- Optical stabilisationNo · X7c: Yes
- Wireless chargingNo · X7c: Yes
- Stereo speakersNo · X7c: Yes
- Wired charging35 W vs 45 W+29%
- Refresh rate120 Hz vs 144 Hz+20%
- Peak brightness850 nits vs 1,300 nits+53%
- Selfie camera5 MP vs 13 MP2.6×
- Memory card slotNo · X7c: Yes
- Bluetooth5 vs 5.4+8%
- Thickness8.2 mm vs 7.6 mm+8%
- Screen-to-body ratio86.8% vs 90.4%+4%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 193 g | 199 g |
| Thickness | 8.2 mm | 7.6 mm |
| Height | 166.9 mm | 163.3 mm |
| Width | 76.8 mm | 74.4 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Aluminium |
| Back | Plastic | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP64 | IP64 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | IPx4 |
| Glass protection | Aluminosilicate glass | — |
| Colours | Moonlight White, Forest Green | Titanium Grey, Ruby Red, Mountain Shade, Shadow Black |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | TFT LCD | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | No | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,412 px | 2,436 px |
| Pixel density | 389 ppi | 393 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 850 nits | 1,300 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 86.8% | 90.4% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM4450 Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 | Mediatek Helio G100 Ultimate |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | MediaTek |
| Process | 4 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.2 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 613 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | 571,597 | 579,515 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 2,104 | 1,946 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | No | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.9 |
| Main sensor size | — | 1/1.57" |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 5 MP | 13 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,200 mAh | 5,200 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 35 W | 45 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 50% |
| Wireless charging | No | Yes |
| Wireless charging power | — | 30 W |
| Reverse wireless charging | — | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 14 | Android 15 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | MagicOS 8 | XOS 15 |
| Major OS updates promised | — | 2 |
