- android.gs
- Compare
- X7b vs nubia Z60 Ultra
Honor X7b vs ZTE nubia Z60 Ultra
What X7b does better (5) and where nubia Z60 Ultra wins (22) — every spec side by side.
vs
5.9Display8.7
6.6Camera9.5
7.7Battery8.4
7.8Features9.3
Dimensions
Size comparison
X7bnubia Z60 Ultra
| X7b | nubia Z60 Ultra | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 166.7 mm | 164 mm | +2.7 mm |
| Width | 76.5 mm | 76.4 mm | +0.1 mm |
| Thickness | 8.2 mm | 8.8 mm | −0.6 mm |
| Weight | 199 g | 246 g | −47 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is X7b better than nubia Z60 Ultra?
- Main camera108 MP vs 50 MP2.2×
- Weight199 g vs 246 g+24%
- Memory card slotYes · nubia Z60 Ultra: No
- 3.5 mm headphone jackYes · nubia Z60 Ultra: No
- Thickness8.2 mm vs 8.8 mm+7%
Why is nubia Z60 Ultra better than X7b?
- Wired charging35 W vs 80 W2.3×
- RAM12 GB vs 24 GB2×
- Storage (max)256 GB vs 1,024 GB4×
- OLED panelNo · X7b: Yes
- Optical stabilisationNo · X7b: Yes
- Telephoto cameraNo · X7b: Yes
- Battery capacity5,330 mAh vs 6,000 mAh+13%
- Refresh rate90 Hz vs 120 Hz+33%
- Peak brightness850 nits vs 1,500 nits+76%
- CPU frequency2.4 GHz vs 3.3 GHz+38%
- Storage (base)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Max video1080p vs 8K
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 199 g | 246 g |
| Thickness | 8.2 mm | 8.8 mm |
| Height | 166.7 mm | 164 mm |
| Width | 76.5 mm | 76.4 mm |
| Frame | — | Aluminium |
| Back | — | Glass |
| Ingress protection | — | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx8 |
| Colours | Flowing Silver, Emerald Green, Midnight Black | Black, Silver, Photographer Edition |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | No | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,116 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,412 px | 2,480 px |
| Pixel density | 389 ppi | 400 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 850 nits | 1,500 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 1,018 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 87.3% | 89.1% |
| HDR | — | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 680 4G | Qualcomm SM8650-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Qualcomm |
| Process | 6 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.4 GHz | 3.3 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 610 | Adreno 750 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 2,094,586 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 7,119 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 5,257 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 24 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 1,024 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 4.0 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 108 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.6 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.67" | 1/1.49" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 3 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | Yes |
| Optical zoom | — | 3.3× |
| Max video | 1080p | 8K |
| 4K video frame rate | — | 120 fps |
| Selfie camera | 8 MP | 12 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,330 mAh | 6,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Active use (test) | — | 14.9 h |
| Wired charging | 35 W | 80 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 87% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | — | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 3.1 |
| USB version | 2 | 3.1 |
| Infrared port | — | Yes |
| Dual-band GPS | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -23.6 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 13 | Android 14 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | MagicOS 8 | MyOS 14 |
