- android.gs
- Compare
- X70 vs Ace 5 Racing
Honor X70 vs OnePlus Ace 5 Racing
What X70 does better (9) and where Ace 5 Racing wins (10) — every spec side by side.
vs
9.5Display8.0
6.8Performance9.1
7.1Camera8.1
9.8Battery9.3
8.9Features6.9
Dimensions
Size comparison
X70Ace 5 Racing
| X70 | Ace 5 Racing | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 161.9 mm | 163.6 mm | −1.7 mm |
| Width | 76.1 mm | 76 mm | +0.1 mm |
| Thickness | 7.8 mm | 8.2 mm | −0.4 mm |
| Weight | 193 g | 200 g | −7 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is X70 better than Ace 5 Racing?
- Peak brightness6,000 nits vs 1,300 nits4.6×
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx8 vs IPx42×
- Wireless chargingYes · Ace 5 Racing: No
- Stereo speakersYes · Ace 5 Racing: No
- Battery capacity8,300 mAh vs 7,100 mAh+17%
- Pixel density427 ppi vs 387 ppi+10%
- Weight193 g vs 200 g+4%
- Resolution (width)1,200 px vs 1,080 px+11%
- Thickness7.8 mm vs 8.2 mm+5%
Why is Ace 5 Racing better than X70?
- AnTuTu score969,048 vs 2,536,9612.6×
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)3,077 vs 7,4522.4×
- RAM12 GB vs 16 GB+33%
- CPU frequency2.3 GHz vs 3.4 GHz+48%
- Storage (base)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
- 4K video frame rate30 fps vs 60 fps2×
- Selfie camera8 MP vs 16 MP2×
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6 vs Wi-Fi 7+17%
- Main camera aperturef/1.9 vs f/1.8+6%
- Bluetooth5.2 vs 5.4+4%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 193 g | 200 g |
| Thickness | 7.8 mm | 8.2 mm |
| Height | 161.9 mm | 163.6 mm |
| Width | 76.1 mm | 76 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | — |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | IP64 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx4 |
| Glass protection | Aluminosilicate glass | Crystal Shield Glass |
| Colours | Black, Green, White, Red, Gold | Black, White, Green |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,200 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,640 px | 2,392 px |
| Pixel density | 427 ppi | 387 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 6,000 nits | 1,300 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 90.9% | 89.7% |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 4 | Mediatek Dimensity 9400e |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | MediaTek |
| Process | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.3 GHz | 3.4 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 810 | Immortalis-G720 MC12 |
| AnTuTu score | 969,048 | 2,536,961 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 3,077 | 7,452 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 16 GB |
| Storage (max) | 512 GB | 512 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 4.0 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | — | 1/1.95" |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | 60 fps |
| Selfie camera | 8 MP | 16 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 8,300 mAh | 7,100 mAh |
| Battery type | Si/C | Si/C |
| Wired charging | 80 W | 80 W |
| Wireless charging | Yes | No |
| Wireless charging power | 80 W | — |
| Reverse wireless charging | Yes | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| Dual-band GPS | Yes | — |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, compass, gyro, proximity (ultrasound) | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 15 | Android 15 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | MagicOS 10 | ColorOS 15 |
