How we scoreBlogAdvertise
android.gsdevices · specs · comparisons
  1. android.gs
  2. Compare
  3. X70 Pro Max vs Poco M8 Pro

Honor X70 Pro Max vs Xiaomi Poco M8 Pro

What X70 Pro Max does better (5) and where Poco M8 Pro wins (12) — every spec side by side.

Honor X70 Pro Max
Honor · 2026X70 Pro Max
9.0Score
5 advantages≈ $270
vs
Xiaomi Poco M8 Pro
Xiaomi · 2026Poco M8 Pro
9.0Score
12 advantages≈ $320
Higher score
9.5Display9.4
5.4Camera7.9
9.5Battery9.1
8.9Features8.8
Dimensions

Size comparison

X70 Pro MaxPoco M8 Pro
76.1 × 161.97.878.3 × 163.38.3
X70 Pro MaxPoco M8 ProDifference
Height161.9 mm163.3 mm−1.4 mm
Width76.1 mm78.3 mm−2.2 mm
Thickness7.8 mm8.3 mm−0.5 mm
Weight196 g206 g−10 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is X70 Pro Max better than Poco M8 Pro?

  1. Battery capacity8,560 mAh vs 6,500 mAh+32%
  2. Peak brightness6,000 nits vs 3,200 nits+88%
  3. Max video4K vs 1080p
  4. Weight196 g vs 206 g+5%
  5. Thickness7.8 mm vs 8.3 mm+6%

Why is Poco M8 Pro better than X70 Pro Max?

  1. RAM8 GB vs 12 GB+50%
  2. Optical stabilisationNo · X70 Pro Max: Yes
  3. Wired charging90 W vs 100 W+11%
  4. Selfie camera8 MP vs 32 MP4×
  5. Rear cameras1 vs 22×
  6. Ultra-wide cameraNo · X70 Pro Max: Yes
  7. CPU frequency2.3 GHz vs 2.7 GHz+17%
  8. Pixel density427 ppi vs 447 ppi+5%
  9. Main camera aperturef/1.8 vs f/1.6+12%
  10. Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6 vs Wi-Fi 6E+8%
  11. Resolution (width)1,200 px vs 1,280 px+7%
  12. Bluetooth5.2 vs 5.4+4%
Specifications

Side by side

Design
Weight196 g206 g
Thickness7.8 mm8.3 mm
Height161.9 mm163.3 mm
Width76.1 mm78.3 mm
FramePlasticPlastic
Back—Plastic
Ingress protectionIP68IP68
Water resistance (IPx)IPx8IPx8
Glass protectionAluminosilicate glassCorning Gorilla Glass Victus 2
ColoursBlack, Violet, Green, GoldBlack, Green, Silver
Display
Screen size6.8″6.8″
PanelAMOLEDAMOLED
OLED panelYesYes
Resolution (width)1,200 px1,280 px
Resolution (height)2,640 px2,772 px
Pixel density427 ppi447 ppi
Refresh rate120 Hz120 Hz
Peak brightness6,000 nits3,200 nits
Measured brightness—1,435 nits
Screen-to-body ratio90.9%89.6%
HDRYesYes
Performance
ChipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 4Qualcomm SM7635-AC Snapdragon 7s Gen 4
Chip makerQualcommQualcomm
Process4 nm4 nm
CPU cores88
CPU frequency2.3 GHz2.7 GHz
GPUAdreno 810Adreno 810
AnTuTu score—817,222
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)—3,245
3DMark Wild Life Extreme—1,110
Memory
RAM8 GB12 GB
Storage (max)512 GB512 GB
Storage (base)256 GB256 GB
Storage type—UFS 2.2
Memory card slotNoNo
Camera
Main camera50 MP50 MP
Main camera aperturef/1.8f/1.6
Main sensor size—1/1.55"
Rear cameras12
Optical stabilisationNoYes
Ultra-wide cameraNoYes
Telephoto cameraNoNo
Max video4K1080p
4K video frame rate30 fps30 fps
Selfie camera8 MP32 MP
4K selfie videoNoNo
Battery
Battery capacity8,560 mAh6,500 mAh
Battery typeSi/CSi/C
Active use (test)—16.2 h
Wired charging90 W100 W
Charged in 30 min—75%
Wireless chargingNoNo
Reverse wireless charging—Yes
Connectivity
5GYesYes
eSIMNoNo
Dual SIMYesYes
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6Wi-Fi 6E
Bluetooth5.25.4
NFCYesYes
USBUSB Type-C 2.0USB Type-C 2.0
USB version22
Infrared port—Yes
Dual-band GPSYes—
Satellite navigationGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavICGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS
Features
Stereo speakersYesYes
3.5 mm headphone jackNoNo
Loudspeaker loudness—-19.5 LUFS
Fingerprint sensorUnder displayUnder display
SensorsFingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, compass, gyro, proximity (ultrasound)Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass, proximity
Software
OS at launchAndroid 16Android 15
PlatformAndroidAndroid
InterfaceMagicOS 10HyperOS 2
Major OS updates promised—4
EU label
Energy class—B
Battery charge cycles—1,000
Endurance per cycle—61 h
Repairability class—C
Drop resistance class—A
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare